CMS2 - Mutiple provider screening and followup

XMLWordPrintable

    • Type: EC eCQMs - Eligible Clinicians
    • Resolution: Answered
    • Priority: High
    • Component/s: None
    • None
    • Hide
      Thank you for inquiring about CMS2v15 (Preventive Care and Screening: Screening for Depression and Follow-Up Plan) eCQM. Based on the use of a shared EMR and this being a patient-based eCQM, the following guidance is applicable:
      • Scenario 1: Both providers would report the same result: Numerator NOT MET (because the most recent screen completed during the measurement period (December) was positive, and no follow-up was documented).
      • Scenario 2: All providers would report the same result: Numerator MET (because the only screen completed was negative).
      • Scenario 3: If all referenced encounters are qualifying encounters, then all providers would report the same result: Numerator MET (This is because the only screen completed during the measurement period (3/1) and within 14days of a qualifying encounter (3/15) was positive, and follow-up was documented within 2 days of the qualifying encounter (follow-up was done 3/15)).
      Show
      Thank you for inquiring about CMS2v15 (Preventive Care and Screening: Screening for Depression and Follow-Up Plan) eCQM. Based on the use of a shared EMR and this being a patient-based eCQM, the following guidance is applicable: • Scenario 1: Both providers would report the same result: Numerator NOT MET (because the most recent screen completed during the measurement period (December) was positive, and no follow-up was documented). • Scenario 2: All providers would report the same result: Numerator MET (because the only screen completed was negative). • Scenario 3: If all referenced encounters are qualifying encounters, then all providers would report the same result: Numerator MET (This is because the only screen completed during the measurement period (3/1) and within 14days of a qualifying encounter (3/15) was positive, and follow-up was documented within 2 days of the qualifying encounter (follow-up was done 3/15)).
    • CMS0002v15
    • CMS0002v14

      Hello, 

      I'm writing to get clarification in reference to resolution/comment posted on CQM-6304 and CQM-8213, as the responses differ. In order for us to clarify, could you please confirm the outcome for the scenarios below with multiple providers within a shared EMR?  

      This is a patient-based measure CMS2 in a shared EMR, and the measure specification mentions the most recent screening to be considered.  

      1. Multiple screenings by different providers throughout the year. 

      Provider John has an encounter and negative screening in March. 

      Provider Mary has an encounter and positive screening in December with no follow-up. 

       As December is the most recent screening for the patient, do both providers not get numerator credit? If not, which providers get numerator credit? 

      2. Given there is a requirement for a screening to occur during or within 14 days of the qualified encounter, in the scenario below where: 

      Provider Sam has an encounter in January and no screening. 

      Provider John has an encounter and negative screening in March.  

      Provider Mary has an encounter in December and no screening. 

         Does Provider Mary also get Numerator credit? Provider Sam had an encounter in January which is before screening, would he also get numerator credit? Or they don’t get credit as their encounters are not within 14 days from the screening? 

      3. Provider Sam has an encounter in January and no screening. 

      Provider John has an encounter and Positive screening on 1st of March.  

      Provider Trace has an encounter on 5th March and no screening. 

      Provider Kris has an encounter and does the follow-up on 15th March. 

      Provider Mary has an encounter in December and no screening. 

          Do all these providers get numerator credit? If not all, which providers get numerator credit? 

      Thank you for your guidance. 

       

            Assignee:
            AIR EC eCQM Team
            Reporter:
            Priyanka Murthy
            Votes:
            0 Vote for this issue
            Watchers:
            2 Start watching this issue

              Created:
              Updated:
              Resolved:
              Solution Posted On: