-
EC eCQMs - Eligible Clinicians
-
Resolution: Answered
-
Moderate
-
None
-
None
-
Chrystal Vidrine
-
Greenway Health
-
-
CMS0137v11
-
With CMS137v11 and the typical workflow for documenting encounters and diagnoses, almost all patients will be excluded from the IPP.
It appears that the 2023 change to use precision=”Day” to evaluate the timing for diagnosis history will not resolve the 137v11 Initiation and Engagement of Substance Use Disorder Treatment timing issue. This is due to the interval order of operations. The In operation is checking if the start of EncounterWithDiagnosis relevantPeriod (this being the historical one) is in an interval that gets created using the IPP encounter relevantPeriod start - 60 days through the relevantPeriod start. Note the type="Interval" line says highClosed="false". When the type="Start" on the <high> element runs, with highClosed being false, it will get the start of the encounter relevantPeriod and subtract one unit from its highest precision. This is the cql predecessor operation. At this point, the data is down to the seconds, so we will subtract one second. This value is handed back as the end of the interval to the In operation. It is only at this point that the day is considered, and In will return true if the single date in the first operand is on the same day as the low/high of the interval or somewhere in between.
To not count the last day of this interval the belief is we would have to subtract 1 day in the <high> element in the same way it is subtracting 60 days in the <low>
Is the intent in the History of SUD Diagnosis or Treatment block that historical being on the same day as the IPP data should still exclude the patient?
Related to https://oncprojectracking.healthit.gov/support/browse/CQM-5474