-
Implementation Guidance
-
Resolution: Delivered
-
Minor
-
None
When creating QRDA3 files, how should the performance rate be reported for measures where the provider has a zero denominator and zero numerator? Reporting zero would be inaccurate. An example where this may occur is CMS 144, where the denominator is more stringent than the IPP, so that it is possible for the provider to have patients in the IPP but not in any other category. Looking at the CMS EP Programs QRDA Category III release 1 Implementation Guide for 2014, volume 2, version 2.0, I am seeing conformance #18399 but it does not give an example for this.
This is also a real problem for Batch Attestation.