-
Enhancement
-
Resolution: Delivered
-
Minor
-
None
-
Diagnosis, Diagnosis, Active, Diagnosis, Family History, Diagnosis, Inactive, Diagnosis, Resolved
QDM currently defines four datatypes in the Condition/Diagnosis/Problem category:
- Diagnosis, Active
- Diagnosis, Inactive
- Diagnosis, Resolved
- Diagnosis, Family History
QDM users have identified several problems related to these datatypes. They can be broadly organized into five categories:
Specificity: Should QDM distinguish between diagnoses, conditions, problems, etc.?State: Diagnoses change datatypes as they progress through states (but probably shouldn't). The Inactive state is ambiguous and poorly supported in EHRs.DateTimes: The formal datetime attribute definitions don't align well with actual use in measures (and may not align well with EHR representations).Ordinality: Support for "principal" diagnoses is poorly supported, especially in regards to tying the ordinality to the encounter.- Miscellaneous: Other attributes in Diagnosis datatypes should be considered for applicability and potentially removed or modified.
In addition, we should consider if Family History should really be a Diagnosis datatype or if it should have some other representation.
- relates to
-
QDM-99 Consider Re-Specifying Diagnosis DateTime Attributes
- Resolved
-
QDM-105 Consider New Ways to Represent Diagnosis State
- Resolved
-
QDM-106 Enhance Support for Principal Diagnosis
- Resolved
-
QDM-107 Consider Re-Specifying Family History
- Resolved
-
QDM-41 Diagnosis attribute of laterality should be retired
- Resolved
-
QDM-104 Consider Adding More Specificity to QDM Diagnosis
- Resolved