How should EKI-23 be implemented by EHR vendors

XMLWordPrintable

    • Type: Bug/Issue
    • Resolution: Resolved
    • Priority: Moderate
    • Hide
      Cypress C1 Record Sample test and Measure calculations for CMS1028 allow for use of any code within the published 2.16.840.1.113762.1.4.1029.213 valueset. Health IT vendors are recommended to record Blood Transfusion codes using the 49 codes listed in the linked EKI-23 ticket.
      Show
      Cypress C1 Record Sample test and Measure calculations for CMS1028 allow for use of any code within the published 2.16.840.1.113762.1.4.1029.213 valueset. Health IT vendors are recommended to record Blood Transfusion codes using the 49 codes listed in the linked EKI-23 ticket.
    • CMS1028v2
    • EH/CAH eCQMs - Eligible Hospitals/Critical Access Hospitals Question

      EKI-23 is linked from the eCQI Resource Center for CMS1028v2 involving Reporting Year 2024. The resolution infers that the removal of codes should apply to the implementation of CMS1028v2. The resolution statement in EKI-23 is not in line with known issues in previous years. Changes to value sets midyear have not been tried since 2018.

      How are hospitals expected to implement this for Reporting Year 2024? Mapping of ICD-10PCS is automated and there is clear coding documentation from billing workflows which would expose hospitals to risk of failing an audit. 

      CYPRESS-2702 indicates that the erroneous codes are still listed in the C1 Sample test criteria when selecting codes from the Blood Transfusion value set. We infer that this means that certified software should be able to record and capture all codes listed. A certified vendor implementing EKI-23 would potentially risk decertification.

            Assignee:
            David Czulada
            Reporter:
            Alex Liu
            Votes:
            0 Vote for this issue
            Watchers:
            11 Start watching this issue

              Created:
              Updated:
              Resolved: