-
Question
-
Resolution: Delivered
-
Major
-
-
Other
The issue a vendor discovered is that Cypress is required to provide various alternatives for the specific clinical codes associated with a clinical concept. However, the behavior of those various clinical codes is not always consistent within the measure.
On this case, the SNOMED and CPT codes are both "legal" for the concept on this measure. However, the sections that should be provided with the QRDA Category 1 XML are different based on which code the EHR vendor selects, because of "bleeding" issues within the CQM.
What results is that Cypress can sometimes expect two or more sections to be present in the QRDA Category 1 XML for one code, but only one section to be present in the QRDA Category 1 XML if the EHR vendor opts to select another code. When these problems occur, EHR vendor should pass certification on this particular issue even though Cypress reports a failure.
The solution to this problem is that Cypress should consider any one of the clinical sections returned in the QRDA Category 1 as "passing", effectively relaxing some of the constraints on the Cypress "smoking gun" tests which were introduced in Cypress v2.3.1.
- is duplicated by
-
CQM-780 Issue w/ the Excel Spreadsheet for manual verification
- Closed
-
CYPRESS-328 CAT I files are requiring codes from two value sets for a single encounter.
- Closed
-
CYPRESS-166 Expected Value Set OID seems incorrect for QRDA-I visual inspection step for patient Heart_Adult_A and measure CMS 90 / NQF measure “FSACHF”
- Closed
-
CYPRESS-171 Expected Value Set OID seems incorrect for QRDA-I visual inspection step for patient Diabetes_Peds_A & Diabetes_Peds_B for measures NQF 24 & NQF ChildDentalDecay
- Closed
- relates to
-
CYPRESS-930 ONE office visit must satisfy TWO value sets
- Closed
-
CYPRESS-634 Valueset missing in 155v3 CAT I File
- Closed