CMS 826 - Pressure Injury: First PI is POA, Develops new PI Later in Stay

XMLWordPrintable

    • Type: Hosp Inpt eCQMs - Hospital Inpatient eCQMs
    • Resolution: Answered
    • Priority: Moderate
    • Component/s: None
    • None
    • Maria Clause
    • Medisolv, Inc
    • Hide
      Thank you for your inquiry regarding CMS826v3, Hospital Harm - Pressure Injury.

      Regarding your first question: If a patient has a deep tissue pressure injury or stage 2, 3, 4, or unstageable pressure injury present on admission (identified either by Present on Admission (POA) indicators or skin exam), then the patient's hospitalization will meet the denominator exclusion criteria and will not be included in the measure calculation. Because this inpatient hospitalization would be excluded from the measure's denominator, the progression of this pressure injury and/or any new pressure injuries that the patient develops later in the hospitalization (either at the original pressure injury site or another site) would not qualify the patient's hospitalization for the measure's numerator. However, if the patient had a stage 1 pressure injury present on admission that worsens to a stage 2 during the hospitalization period, the inpatient hospitalization for this patient may meet the numerator criteria, as this would be considered a new stage 2 pressure injury. Inpatient hospitalizations for patients with a stage 1 pressure injury present on admission are not excluded from the measure's denominator. So, in the example you provided, because the patient has a stage 2 pressure injury with a POA indicator of "Y", then the inpatient hospitalization for this patient would be excluded from the measure's denominator, meaning that the inpatient hospitalization would not qualify for the measure's numerator.

      Regarding your second question: The measure uses codes from the following value sets to identify diagnoses or findings of stage 2, 3, 4, deep tissue, and unstageable pressure injuries:

      · "Pressure Injury Deep Tissue" (2.16.840.1.113762.1.4.1147.112)
      · "Pressure Injury Deep Tissue Diagnoses" (2.16.840.1.113762.1.4.1147.194)
      · "Pressure Injury Stage 2, 3, 4 or Unstageable" (2.16.840.1.113762.1.4.1147.113)
      · "Pressure Injury Stage 2, 3, 4, or Unstageable Diagnoses" (2.16.840.1.113762.1.4.1147.196)

      These four value sets include SNOMED CT, LOINC, and ICD-10-CM codes. The measure identifies any pressure injury diagnosis with a SNOMED CT, LOINC, or ICD-10-CM code that is contained in one of those four value sets. The measure does not prioritize a pressure injury diagnosis coded with one code system over another pressure injury diagnosis coded with a different code system. More information on the codes contained in these value sets can be found on the Value Set Authority Center (vsac.nlm.nih.gov).
      Show
      Thank you for your inquiry regarding CMS826v3, Hospital Harm - Pressure Injury. Regarding your first question: If a patient has a deep tissue pressure injury or stage 2, 3, 4, or unstageable pressure injury present on admission (identified either by Present on Admission (POA) indicators or skin exam), then the patient's hospitalization will meet the denominator exclusion criteria and will not be included in the measure calculation. Because this inpatient hospitalization would be excluded from the measure's denominator, the progression of this pressure injury and/or any new pressure injuries that the patient develops later in the hospitalization (either at the original pressure injury site or another site) would not qualify the patient's hospitalization for the measure's numerator. However, if the patient had a stage 1 pressure injury present on admission that worsens to a stage 2 during the hospitalization period, the inpatient hospitalization for this patient may meet the numerator criteria, as this would be considered a new stage 2 pressure injury. Inpatient hospitalizations for patients with a stage 1 pressure injury present on admission are not excluded from the measure's denominator. So, in the example you provided, because the patient has a stage 2 pressure injury with a POA indicator of "Y", then the inpatient hospitalization for this patient would be excluded from the measure's denominator, meaning that the inpatient hospitalization would not qualify for the measure's numerator. Regarding your second question: The measure uses codes from the following value sets to identify diagnoses or findings of stage 2, 3, 4, deep tissue, and unstageable pressure injuries: · "Pressure Injury Deep Tissue" (2.16.840.1.113762.1.4.1147.112) · "Pressure Injury Deep Tissue Diagnoses" (2.16.840.1.113762.1.4.1147.194) · "Pressure Injury Stage 2, 3, 4 or Unstageable" (2.16.840.1.113762.1.4.1147.113) · "Pressure Injury Stage 2, 3, 4, or Unstageable Diagnoses" (2.16.840.1.113762.1.4.1147.196) These four value sets include SNOMED CT, LOINC, and ICD-10-CM codes. The measure identifies any pressure injury diagnosis with a SNOMED CT, LOINC, or ICD-10-CM code that is contained in one of those four value sets. The measure does not prioritize a pressure injury diagnosis coded with one code system over another pressure injury diagnosis coded with a different code system. More information on the codes contained in these value sets can be found on the Value Set Authority Center (vsac.nlm.nih.gov).
    • CMS0826v3
    • CMS0826v1
    • Accurate Data/Results

      Does the Pressure Injury Measure Logic account for Injury #2 that happens later in the stay when there is an Injury #1 that is POA?  Or does the encounter get Excluded based on the POA injury and the Injury #2 doesn't get evaluated for Numerator?

       

      Ex: 
      Patient has Stage 2 PI on Right Heel that is POA (Coding)
      5 Days later, there is documentation of a new Stage 2 PI on the sacrum not POA (Coding)

      1. Based on the Logic, is the encounter Excluded or In Numerator? 
      2. Is there any difference in the result if this is captured via Coding ICD10 or via Nursing Documentation SNOMED?  Ex: PI#1 via Coding POA, then PI#2 via Documentation SNOMED.

            Assignee:
            Mathematica EH eCQM Team
            Reporter:
            Maria Clause
            Votes:
            1 Vote for this issue
            Watchers:
            4 Start watching this issue

              Created:
              Updated:
              Resolved:
              Solution Posted On: