Denominator Exclusion

XMLWordPrintable

    • Type: Hosp Outpt eCQMs - Hospital Outpatient eCQMs
    • Resolution: Answered
    • Priority: Moderate
    • Component/s: None
    • None
    • Hide
      Thank you for your follow-up inquiry regarding CMS996: Appropriate Treatment for ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction (STEMI) Patients in the Emergency Department (ED). We interpret the intent of the inquiry is to determine why a patient with a D17.79 (Benign lipomatous neoplasm of other sites) ICD-10-CM diagnosis coded as present on admission (POA) was not excluded from the measure denominator. The measure excludes patients with known malignant intracranial neoplasms (primary or metastatic) if the condition starts before the start of the ED encounter and does not end before the ED encounter. The reason the patient was not excluded from the measure denominator is because ICD-10-CM code D17.79 is not captured in the Malignant Intracranial Neoplasm Group value set (OID: 2.16.840.1.113762.1.4.1170.3) that the measure uses for this exclusion. This value set can be found on the Value Set Authority Center (VSAC) [https://vsac.nlm.nih.gov/valueset/2.16.840.1.113762.1.4.1170.3/expansion/Latest]. Please note that you may need to create a free account to view these codes. The reason that code D17.79 is not included in the value set is because the measure excludes malignant neoplasms, and code D17.79 indicates a benign neoplasm.

      The logic in the “Active Exclusion Diagnosis At Start of ED Encounter” definition found in the measure’s HTML file [https://ecqi.healthit.gov/sites/default/files/ecqm/measures/CMS996-v6.3.000-QDM.html] excludes conditions that start before the ED encounter and do not end before the ED encounter, in alignment with how the exclusion is described in the HTML header. Please see the following definition below:

      Active Exclusion Diagnosis At Start Of ED Encounter

        "ED Encounter With STEMI Diagnosis" EDwSTEMI

          with ( ["Diagnosis": "Active Bleeding or Bleeding Diathesis, Excluding Menses"]

            union ["Diagnosis": "Malignant Intracranial Neoplasm Group"]

            union ["Diagnosis": "Cerebral Vascular Lesion"]

            union ["Diagnosis": "Dementia and Related Intracranial Pathologies"]

            union ["Diagnosis": "Pregnant State"]

            union ["Diagnosis": "Allergy to thrombolytics"] ) ActiveExclusionDx

            such that ActiveExclusionDx.prevalencePeriod overlaps before EDwSTEMI.relevantPeriod


      The exclusion definition above shows that the diagnosis prevalencePeriod (or time from diagnosis onset to abatement) “overlaps before” the ED encounter relevantPeriod (or the time the encounter began to the time the encounter ended). Meaning, the patient’s diagnosis needs to start before the ED encounter begins for the encounter to be excluded from the measure denominator. Thank you for pointing out the discrepancy between the exclusion definition name in the HTML file and its logic, the measure developer can consider updating the exclusion definition name in a future annual update.
      Show
      Thank you for your follow-up inquiry regarding CMS996: Appropriate Treatment for ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction (STEMI) Patients in the Emergency Department (ED). We interpret the intent of the inquiry is to determine why a patient with a D17.79 (Benign lipomatous neoplasm of other sites) ICD-10-CM diagnosis coded as present on admission (POA) was not excluded from the measure denominator. The measure excludes patients with known malignant intracranial neoplasms (primary or metastatic) if the condition starts before the start of the ED encounter and does not end before the ED encounter. The reason the patient was not excluded from the measure denominator is because ICD-10-CM code D17.79 is not captured in the Malignant Intracranial Neoplasm Group value set (OID: 2.16.840.1.113762.1.4.1170.3) that the measure uses for this exclusion. This value set can be found on the Value Set Authority Center (VSAC) [ https://vsac.nlm.nih.gov/valueset/2.16.840.1.113762.1.4.1170.3/expansion/Latest ]. Please note that you may need to create a free account to view these codes. The reason that code D17.79 is not included in the value set is because the measure excludes malignant neoplasms, and code D17.79 indicates a benign neoplasm. The logic in the “Active Exclusion Diagnosis At Start of ED Encounter” definition found in the measure’s HTML file [ https://ecqi.healthit.gov/sites/default/files/ecqm/measures/CMS996-v6.3.000-QDM.html ] excludes conditions that start before the ED encounter and do not end before the ED encounter, in alignment with how the exclusion is described in the HTML header. Please see the following definition below: Active Exclusion Diagnosis At Start Of ED Encounter   "ED Encounter With STEMI Diagnosis" EDwSTEMI     with ( ["Diagnosis": "Active Bleeding or Bleeding Diathesis, Excluding Menses"]       union ["Diagnosis": "Malignant Intracranial Neoplasm Group"]       union ["Diagnosis": "Cerebral Vascular Lesion"]       union ["Diagnosis": "Dementia and Related Intracranial Pathologies"]       union ["Diagnosis": "Pregnant State"]       union ["Diagnosis": "Allergy to thrombolytics"] ) ActiveExclusionDx       such that ActiveExclusionDx.prevalencePeriod overlaps before EDwSTEMI.relevantPeriod The exclusion definition above shows that the diagnosis prevalencePeriod (or time from diagnosis onset to abatement) “overlaps before” the ED encounter relevantPeriod (or the time the encounter began to the time the encounter ended). Meaning, the patient’s diagnosis needs to start before the ED encounter begins for the encounter to be excluded from the measure denominator. Thank you for pointing out the discrepancy between the exclusion definition name in the HTML file and its logic, the measure developer can consider updating the exclusion definition name in a future annual update.
    • CMS0996v5
    • Inaccurate Numerator and Denominator Outcome

      Our hospital had a case wherein the pt had the exclusion code D17.79 Benign lipomatous neoplasm of other sites POA: Yes. This means that the patient had the diagnosis before ED arrival or else the code would have been a POA: No (meaning diagnosis happened after pt came to the ED). As a result, the case mentioned above was not excluded from the measure.  

      The Denominator Exclusion and Denominator Guidance does not match (refer to the attached). One says starts before ED encounter, the "definition" QRDA logic says at start of ED encounter. This is resulting to an incorrect case outcome of the OP STEMI eCQM.

      Codes does not have a time attached to it to identify what codes are before the ED encounter date/time. POA: Yes/No should be factored in to the logic build in identifying what codes were assigned prior to ED admission vs codes that happened after ED encounter.

            Assignee:
            Mathematica EH eCQM Team
            Reporter:
            Charlene Noblejas
            Votes:
            0 Vote for this issue
            Watchers:
            3 Start watching this issue

              Created:
              Updated:
              Resolved:
              Solution Posted On: