Clarification on transfer within the same CCN

XMLWordPrintable

    • Type: Hosp Outpt eCQMs - Hospital Outpatient eCQMs
    • Resolution: Answered
    • Priority: Moderate
    • Component/s: None
    • None
    • Maria C Gomez
    • The University of New Mexico Hospitals
    • Hide
      Thank you for your inquiry regarding CMS996: Appropriate Treatment for ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction (STEMI) Patients in the Emergency Department (ED). The measure defines appropriate STEMI treatment using three numerators: fibrinolytic therapy within 30 minutes of ED arrival, percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) within 90 minutes of ED arrival, or discharge to acute care within 45 minutes of ED arrival. We understand the intent of your question is to determine how the measure handles scenarios in which a patient arrives at the ED of one hospital and then is transferred to a hospital at a different location with the same CMS Certification Number (CCN). The measure can handle the case described in the inquiry in different ways depending on how the encounter(s) are documented in the EHR:

      1. First, if the patient had an ED encounter at the first hospital and an inpatient (IP) encounter at the second hospital, then the ED encounter at the first hospital could be captured in the measure numerator if the patient is discharged to acute care at the second hospital within 45 minutes of the first hospital’s ED arrival time. To be captured in this numerator criterion, we recommend that the ED encounter of the first hospital has proper documentation of both the ED discharge time and the ED discharge disposition of “Discharge to Acute Care Facility.” In this scenario, the second hospital’s IP encounter would not be captured in the measure denominator since it is the measure’s intent to only capture ED encounters (and that patient was sent directly to second hospital’s inpatient admission).

      2. Second, if the scenario documents the patient as having two ED encounters – one at the first hospital and one at the second hospital – the first ED encounter could not meet the third numerator criterion: discharge to acute care within 45 minutes of ED arrival. To meet this numerator criterion, the first ED encounter must have a discharge disposition of “Discharge to Acute Care Facility.” Since the encounter at the second facility is an ED encounter rather than an IP encounter, the patient’s first ED encounter cannot have a discharge disposition of “Discharge to Acute Care Facility” regardless of the time stamp that the transfer occurred. If the end of the first ED encounter was properly documented with an ED discharge time and discharge disposition, the EHR would treat the ED encounter at the second hospital as a separate encounter. In this case, the second ED encounter could potentially meet the measure numerator if the patient received fibrinolytic therapy within 30 minutes of the patient’s ED arrival at the second hospital or PCI within 90 minutes of the patient’s ED arrival at the second hospital.

      3. Lastly, if the scenario is documented in the EHR as only one ED encounter, then it will use the ED arrival time of the first hospital to determine numerator inclusion.
      Show
      Thank you for your inquiry regarding CMS996: Appropriate Treatment for ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction (STEMI) Patients in the Emergency Department (ED). The measure defines appropriate STEMI treatment using three numerators: fibrinolytic therapy within 30 minutes of ED arrival, percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) within 90 minutes of ED arrival, or discharge to acute care within 45 minutes of ED arrival. We understand the intent of your question is to determine how the measure handles scenarios in which a patient arrives at the ED of one hospital and then is transferred to a hospital at a different location with the same CMS Certification Number (CCN). The measure can handle the case described in the inquiry in different ways depending on how the encounter(s) are documented in the EHR: 1. First, if the patient had an ED encounter at the first hospital and an inpatient (IP) encounter at the second hospital, then the ED encounter at the first hospital could be captured in the measure numerator if the patient is discharged to acute care at the second hospital within 45 minutes of the first hospital’s ED arrival time. To be captured in this numerator criterion, we recommend that the ED encounter of the first hospital has proper documentation of both the ED discharge time and the ED discharge disposition of “Discharge to Acute Care Facility.” In this scenario, the second hospital’s IP encounter would not be captured in the measure denominator since it is the measure’s intent to only capture ED encounters (and that patient was sent directly to second hospital’s inpatient admission). 2. Second, if the scenario documents the patient as having two ED encounters – one at the first hospital and one at the second hospital – the first ED encounter could not meet the third numerator criterion: discharge to acute care within 45 minutes of ED arrival. To meet this numerator criterion, the first ED encounter must have a discharge disposition of “Discharge to Acute Care Facility.” Since the encounter at the second facility is an ED encounter rather than an IP encounter, the patient’s first ED encounter cannot have a discharge disposition of “Discharge to Acute Care Facility” regardless of the time stamp that the transfer occurred. If the end of the first ED encounter was properly documented with an ED discharge time and discharge disposition, the EHR would treat the ED encounter at the second hospital as a separate encounter. In this case, the second ED encounter could potentially meet the measure numerator if the patient received fibrinolytic therapy within 30 minutes of the patient’s ED arrival at the second hospital or PCI within 90 minutes of the patient’s ED arrival at the second hospital. 3. Lastly, if the scenario is documented in the EHR as only one ED encounter, then it will use the ED arrival time of the first hospital to determine numerator inclusion.
    • CMS0996v5

      Good afternoon, What would the process for data extraction/validation be if two emergency departments in different locations are under the same CCN. For instance one of the hospitals has a Cath lab and the other one doesn't, If the patient arrives and gets transferred from the ED with no Cath lab to the hospital with a Cath lab (different location) but both have the same CCN, would this be a transfer? or would the logic still capture time of the first location: ED arrival to PCI? and exclude the travel time

      Thank you

            Assignee:
            Augustine Weber
            Reporter:
            Maria C Gomez
            Votes:
            0 Vote for this issue
            Watchers:
            3 Start watching this issue

              Created:
              Updated:
              Resolved:
              Solution Posted On: