Clarification of Bipolar Diagnosis associated with a qualifying encounter

XMLWordPrintable

    • Type: EC eCQMs - Eligible Clinicians
    • Resolution: Answered
    • Priority: Moderate
    • Component/s: None
    • None
    • Hide
      Thank you for inquiring about the Preventive Care and Screening: Screening for Depression and Follow-Up Plan eCQM. Once a bipolar disorder diagnosis is present in the record (the type of encounter that documents it does not matter) and there are any subsequent encounters (with or without screening), the measure considers the patient excluded from measure consideration (clinically, patients with a bipolar diagnosis should be seeing a psychiatric care provider specific to these needs, and this provider would also be able to address depression). Please note that in eCQMs, denominator exclusions remove patients from the qualifying population before determining if they meet the numerator criteria.
       
      Example:
      1. Look at all qualifying encounters during measurement period
      Per scenario: 4/3/25; 5/11/25
      2. Determine if there was a bipolar diagnosis prior to any of the qualifying encounters
      Per scenario: Yes, on 5/3/25 (qualifying encounter 5/11/25)
      3. If yes, exclude (and STOP evaluation)
      Per scenario: Patient meets denominator exclusion.
      4. If no, check to see if they were screened for depression
      5. If screened positive for depression, was there follow-up… etc.
       
      In your presented scenario, the patient would have met the denominator exclusion because there was a qualifying encounter after the bipolar disorder diagnosis. You do not use the most recent qualifying encounter; it is a matter of determining if there was a bipolar diagnosis prior to any qualifying encounter.
      Show
      Thank you for inquiring about the Preventive Care and Screening: Screening for Depression and Follow-Up Plan eCQM. Once a bipolar disorder diagnosis is present in the record (the type of encounter that documents it does not matter) and there are any subsequent encounters (with or without screening), the measure considers the patient excluded from measure consideration (clinically, patients with a bipolar diagnosis should be seeing a psychiatric care provider specific to these needs, and this provider would also be able to address depression). Please note that in eCQMs, denominator exclusions remove patients from the qualifying population before determining if they meet the numerator criteria.   Example: 1. Look at all qualifying encounters during measurement period Per scenario: 4/3/25; 5/11/25 2. Determine if there was a bipolar diagnosis prior to any of the qualifying encounters Per scenario: Yes, on 5/3/25 (qualifying encounter 5/11/25) 3. If yes, exclude (and STOP evaluation) Per scenario: Patient meets denominator exclusion. 4. If no, check to see if they were screened for depression 5. If screened positive for depression, was there follow-up… etc.   In your presented scenario, the patient would have met the denominator exclusion because there was a qualifying encounter after the bipolar disorder diagnosis. You do not use the most recent qualifying encounter; it is a matter of determining if there was a bipolar diagnosis prior to any qualifying encounter.
    • CMS0002v14

      CMS 2 - Depression Screening and Follow-up specifications state the following:

      History of Bipolar Diagnosis Before Qualifying Encounter

      • ["Diagnosis": "Bipolar Disorder"] BipolarDiagnosis
        with "Qualifying Encounter During Measurement Period" QualifyingEncounter
        such that BipolarDiagnosis.prevalencePeriod starts before QualifyingEncounter.relevantPeriod

       Clarification:  If the patient had multiple qualifying encounters during the measurement period, which qualifying encounter should be used to identify exclusion due to bipolar diagnosis?

      Scenario 1:

      Patient had qualifying encounter on 4/3/2025 with a depression screening completed on 4/3/2025.  Patient had a bipolar diagnosis on 5/3/2025 at a non-eligible encounter. Patient had another qualifying encounter on 5/11/2025 (no screening at this visit).   The 4/3/2025 eligible encounter occurred prior to the bipolar diagnosis.  The 5/11/2025 eligible encounter occurred after the bipolar diagnosis.  Which eligible encounter should be used to determine if the patient is excluded from the measure?

      Using the 4/3/2025 eligible encounter would not exclude the patient. 

      Using the 5/11/2025 eligible encounter would exclude the patient.

      Should organizations always use the most recent eligible encounter to determine exclusion from the measure for bipolar diagnosis?

            Assignee:
            AIR EC eCQM Team
            Reporter:
            Shari Black
            Votes:
            0 Vote for this issue
            Watchers:
            3 Start watching this issue

              Created:
              Updated:
              Resolved:
              Solution Posted On: