PC-7 Numerator Questions

XMLWordPrintable

    • Type: Hosp Inpt eCQMs - Hospital Inpatient eCQMs
    • Resolution: Answered
    • Priority: Moderate
    • Component/s: None
    • None
    • sandeep Singh-bajaj
    • 6303442421
    • UIH
    • Hide
      Thank you for your question about CMS1028v3 / PC-07 Severe Obstetric Complications (SOCs). Yes, one patient can be in both numerators. There are two performance rate calculations for this measure from the same initial population, with the same denominator and denominator exclusions.

       

      For the examples given, the patient with J96.01 acute respiratory failure with hypoxia would be in both numerators if it is a diagnosis that was not present on admission and as the only SOC, it is it not a blood transfusion. The patient in which the only SOC was a blood transfusion during the delivery encounter, would be included in numerator 1 but in numerator 2, since it is the only SOC.

       

      For the third patient provided, the inclusion of the word "chronic" gives me pause. Pulmonary edema diagnosed during the delivery encounter and NOT present on admission would be an SOC, and together with the blood transfusion would qualify for both numerator 1 & numerator 2. However, chronic pulmonary edema present-on-admission, pulmonary hypertension present-on-admission, or acute or chronic diastolic (congestive) heart failure present on admission would NOT be an SOC, but potentially a risk adjustment variable. If the diagnosis was present on admission for the delivery encounter, then the patient would only be in numerator 1 and not numerator 2 with the blood transfusion being the only SOC. Please also see the attached table.
      Show
      Thank you for your question about CMS1028v3 / PC-07 Severe Obstetric Complications (SOCs). Yes, one patient can be in both numerators. There are two performance rate calculations for this measure from the same initial population, with the same denominator and denominator exclusions.   For the examples given, the patient with J96.01 acute respiratory failure with hypoxia would be in both numerators if it is a diagnosis that was not present on admission and as the only SOC, it is it not a blood transfusion. The patient in which the only SOC was a blood transfusion during the delivery encounter, would be included in numerator 1 but in numerator 2, since it is the only SOC.   For the third patient provided, the inclusion of the word "chronic" gives me pause. Pulmonary edema diagnosed during the delivery encounter and NOT present on admission would be an SOC, and together with the blood transfusion would qualify for both numerator 1 & numerator 2. However, chronic pulmonary edema present-on-admission, pulmonary hypertension present-on-admission, or acute or chronic diastolic (congestive) heart failure present on admission would NOT be an SOC, but potentially a risk adjustment variable. If the diagnosis was present on admission for the delivery encounter, then the patient would only be in numerator 1 and not numerator 2 with the blood transfusion being the only SOC. Please also see the attached table.
    • CMS1218v1
    • CMS1074v2
    • CMS0832v1
    • Hello, I have an understanding that PC-7 has two numerator data elements. Can you please let me know how to classify the following patients

      Case Status.docx

      Hello, My question is related to PC-7 – Severe Obstetric Complications – Numerator 1 and Numerator 2. Can you please explain where these below examples would fall as far as the numerator goes. My understanding is that if there is one complication – and no blood transfusion was done patient would fall into the numerator 1. If there was only a blood transfusion it is still numerator 1. If there are blood transfusion and a blood transfusion then they are numerator 2? Can one patient be in both numerators ?
      1. Pt with J96.01 Acute respiratory failure with hypoxia only
      2.Pt with blood transfusion only
      3. Pt with J81.1 Chronic pulmonary edema and blood transfusion

            Assignee:
            Augustine Weber
            Reporter:
            Sandeep Singh Bajaj
            Votes:
            0 Vote for this issue
            Watchers:
            3 Start watching this issue

              Created:
              Updated:
              Resolved:
              Solution Posted On: