-
Type:
Hosp Inpt eCQMs - Hospital Inpatient eCQMs
-
Resolution: Answered
-
Priority:
Moderate
-
Component/s: None
-
None
-
Amanda Lopez
-
9547014242
-
-
CMS0986v3
-
CMS0108v13
-
Workflow and documentation
We are looking for clarification on the requirements within the eCQM measure of CMS108.
Specifically, we are working to understand whether or not, with CMS108, providers are required to document both pharmacological AND mechanical VTE Prophylaxis?
Based on the details within the measure, it appears that there is conflicting requirements.
In the "Guidance" section of the rule, it outlines "Reasons for no pharmacological and no mechanical VTA prophylaxis must be explicitly documented by the MD/APN/PA or Pharmacist and linked with VTE prophylaxis."
Unable to render embedded object: File (eyZabynLHW8AAAAASUVORK5CYII=) not found.
However, in the logic of the rule, the section "Encounter with VTE Prophylaxis Received from Day of Start of Hospitalization to Day After Admission or Procedure", there is an "OR" between "Pharmacological OR Mechanical VTE Prophylaxis Received".
Unable to render embedded object: File (dgAAAABJRU5ErkJggg==) not found.
We would like to know if there is a requirement for documenting both Pharmacological and Mechanical, or if it is sufficient to document one or the other, during the qualifying encounter.
Your assistance is appreciated!