XMLWordPrintable

    • Type: Hosp Outpt eCQMs - Hospital Outpatient eCQMs
    • Resolution: Answered
    • Priority: Moderate
    • Component/s: None
    • None
    • Virginia V. Armendariz
    • 9153416355
    • University Medical Center of El Paso
    • Hide
      Thank you for your inquiry regarding CMS996v5, Appropriate Treatment for ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction (STEMI) Patients in the Emergency Department (ED). The measure does not currently use timing of electrocardiograms (EKGs). This decision was based on clinical expert input and measure testing results, which indicate that EKG timing in electronic health record (EHR) documentation is unreliable. Additionally, the issue of the measure not excluding cases where the STEMI develops during the ED encounter, but the measure still assesses appropriate treatment starting from ED arrival time, will be assessed in a future annual update.


      The measure developer will consider adding a denominator exception, during a future Annual Update, for encounters in which there is a documented reason for not performing the measure’s numerator criteria, indicated by broad value sets for patient refusal, procedure/drug intervention not indicated/contraindicated, etc.. Furthermore, the measure developer will consider adding a denominator exclusion, specific to encounters in which a patient left against medical advice, in a future Annual Update. The measure developer will consider refinements to the measure logic and value set refinements, in accordance with clinical guidelines om a future annual update. Value sets used for measure exclusion criteria are broad, to accommodate various clinical scenarios for inclusion in the measure’s initial population.
      Show
      Thank you for your inquiry regarding CMS996v5, Appropriate Treatment for ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction (STEMI) Patients in the Emergency Department (ED). The measure does not currently use timing of electrocardiograms (EKGs). This decision was based on clinical expert input and measure testing results, which indicate that EKG timing in electronic health record (EHR) documentation is unreliable. Additionally, the issue of the measure not excluding cases where the STEMI develops during the ED encounter, but the measure still assesses appropriate treatment starting from ED arrival time, will be assessed in a future annual update. The measure developer will consider adding a denominator exception, during a future Annual Update, for encounters in which there is a documented reason for not performing the measure’s numerator criteria, indicated by broad value sets for patient refusal, procedure/drug intervention not indicated/contraindicated, etc.. Furthermore, the measure developer will consider adding a denominator exclusion, specific to encounters in which a patient left against medical advice, in a future Annual Update. The measure developer will consider refinements to the measure logic and value set refinements, in accordance with clinical guidelines om a future annual update. Value sets used for measure exclusion criteria are broad, to accommodate various clinical scenarios for inclusion in the measure’s initial population.
    • CMS0996v5, CMS1206v1, CMS1206v2
    • CMS0996v4
    • Causing decreased compliance with denominator without appropriate exclusion.

      Can you please provide an update for patients who do NOT present with a STEMI on the first EKG?  How can we meet the metric for patients whose EKG evolves into a STEMI on the 2nd or 3rd EKG?  We are not meeting time on these cases as your definition says the clock starts when the patient arrives event if the first EKG is negative.   For the evolving STEMI, the clock should start when the 2nd or 3rd EKG reads STEMI.

      Can you also provide an update to additional exclusions such at patient refusal, delay in consent for procedure, difficulty crossing lesion, need for transvenous pacer for symptomatic bradycardia. 

      Others have mentioned using the already established exclusions in both GWTG-CAD and the ACC NCDR ChestPain-MI registries.  Can you please review and follow suit to ensure that this aligns with those that write the guidelines (ACC)?

            Assignee:
            Augustine Weber
            Reporter:
            Virginia V. Armendariz (Inactive)
            Votes:
            0 Vote for this issue
            Watchers:
            6 Start watching this issue

              Created:
              Updated:
              Resolved:
              Solution Posted On: