-
EC eCQMs - Eligible Clinicians
-
Resolution: Answered
-
Moderate
-
None
-
None
-
Jennifer A Chamberland
-
207-441-0552
-
MaineGeneral Medical Center
-
-
CMS0002v14
-
CMS0002v13
-
Impacting performance across the organization
We have to write our own internal tracking report for Depression Screening to monitor performance and want to make sure our logic is accurate. Right now we are giving credit for the 'most" recent Depression Screen documented. We report to MIPS as a group across Primary Care and Medical Specialties who all use the same EMR. If a patient is seen in Primary Care and they do a depression screen and document properly they will get credit of 'met' for that patient. However if then the patient sees a Behavioral Health clinician in another practice after the Primary Care visit and they document a depression screen but did not document it properly we now consider that patient not met even though they had one that was done already once in the calendar year. Is that correct logic that if there is more than one screening done during the calendar year that the most recent is what should be considered for numerator or should we give credit for the patient if they had at least one and it was documented correctly.