-
EC eCQMs - Eligible Clinicians
-
Resolution: Answered
-
Moderate
-
None
-
None
-
-
CMS0002v14
Our organization has a process in which patients with existing, active depression are engaged via the patient portal to complete a PHQ9 on a minimum of a quarterly basis to monitor their depression. This monitoring process sometimes overlaps with an eligible encounter and clarification is being requested.
SCENARIO
January 15th - patient sent PHQ9 via patient portal for monitoring of existing, active depression diagnosis by the primary care provider. No eligible encounter on or 14 days prior to the screening. Screening is negative and patient needs addressed.
May 15th - patient sent PHQ9 via patient portal for monitoring of existing, active depression by the primary care provider. Screening is positive. Provider makes medication change on May 15th.
May 26th - Patient has an eligible encounter with a specialty provider. Patient not screened for depression at visit because patient needs are being addressed via by primary care provider care management processes. Specialty provider does not address PHQ9 completed on May 15th on the day of the eligible encounter or two days after the encounter because primary care is actively managing the patient's needs.
August 15th - patient sent PHQ9 via patient portal for monitoring of existing, active depression by the primary care provider. No eligible encounter on or 14 days prior to the screening. Patient screens negative and patient needs addressed.
November 15th - patient sent PHQ9 via patient portal for monitoring of existing depression by primary care provider. No eligible encounter on or 14 days prior to the screening. Patient screens negative and patient needs addressed.
Regarding the May 26th eligible visit, would the patient not be in the numerator if the specialty provider did not address the PHQ9 on or two days after the eligible visit?
From a population health standpoint, significant resources are being used to actively manage patients with active depression diagnoses throughout the measurement year. What options do organizations have to report appropriate screenings and follow-up during the measurement year that may not be addressed by the specific provider at an eligible visit but is being managed by another provider?