Uploaded image for project: 'eCQM Issue Tracker'
  1. eCQM Issue Tracker
  2. CQM-7513

CMS50 - Discrepancy between narrative guidance and CQL

XMLWordPrintable

    • Icon: EC eCQMs - Eligible Clinicians EC eCQMs - Eligible Clinicians
    • Resolution: Answered
    • Icon: Moderate Moderate
    • None
    • None
    • Hide
      Thank you for your question regarding CMS50v12. We will review the alignment of the information in the measure header and measure logic and will determine if a change is required. At this time, we cannot provide a specific timeline of when a change may be incorporated in the measure.
      Show
      Thank you for your question regarding CMS50v12. We will review the alignment of the information in the measure header and measure logic and will determine if a change is required. At this time, we cannot provide a specific timeline of when a change may be incorporated in the measure.
    • CMS0050v13
    • CMS0050v12

      The narrative section of CMS50 (Closing the Referral Loop: Receipt of Specialist Report) states that "The clinician who refers the patient to another clinician is the clinician who should be held accountable for the performance of this measure."

      As per the narrative guidance, the measure is expecting the first referral for a patient is considered for each clinician who orders a valid referral (First referral at a provider level). The measure's result for the patient should be attributed to each such provider. 

      Also, the expectation is that each such referral should have consult note tied to the referral in order to satisfy the numerator. If a first referral for one provider (Provider A) has a consult note tied and a first referral for another provider (Provider B) doesn't have a consult note tied then Numerator for Provider A will be 1 where as for Provider B will be 0 for the same patient.

       

      Below is an example scenario and the response received from CMS on the same:

       

      However, the CQL specification of the measure CMS50v12 does not reflect the same logic as the narrative guidance. There is no mention of the referring provider for the first referral in the denominator or the numerator logic of the CQL.

       

      This is discrepant from the narrative guidance and the guidance from CMS. 

      Is there a plan to revise the CQL logic to align it with the narrative guidance? If yes, is there an ETA?

       

       

            AIR EC eCQM Team AIR EC eCQM Team
            knisarg Nisarg Khandekar (Inactive)
            Votes:
            0 Vote for this issue
            Watchers:
            3 Start watching this issue

              Created:
              Updated:
              Resolved:
              Solution Posted On: