-
EH/CAH eCQMs - Eligible Hospitals/Critical Access Hospitals
-
Resolution: Answered
-
Moderate
-
None
-
None
-
The Joint Commission
-
-
CMS0871v4
-
The new 'Numerator Exclusions' is redundant and creates needless implementer burden.
'Numerator Exclusion' and 'Denominator Exclusion' both use the same definition. It seems to us that if an EOC is excluded from the Denominator population by this 'Denominator Exclusion' definition, that this same definition used for 'Numerator Exclusion' will not have anything left to exclude.
Denominator Exclusions
"Encounter with Early Glucose Greater Than or Equal to 1000 or with Comfort or Hospice Care"
Numerator Exclusions
"Encounter with Early Glucose Greater Than or Equal to 1000 or with Comfort or Hospice Care"
Our concern is for implementer burden and efficiency. For some implementers, this may be the first measure that uses 'Numerator Exclusion'.
Is there any way this identical 'Numerator Exclusion' and 'Denominator Exclusion' has an affect on the measure results? If not, can the measure be amended to remove the 'Numerator Exclusion'?