We need to confirm the expected functionality of the word "overlaps". In the Exclusion of CMS122 (with similar concepts in other measures), there is the following verbiage:

• exists ( ["Device, Order": "Frailty Device"] FrailtyDeviceOrder
  where FrailtyDeviceOrder.authorDatetime during day of "Measurement Period"
  )
  or exists ( ["Assessment, Performed": "Medical equipment used"] EquipmentUsed
  where EquipmentUsed.result in "Frailty Device"
  and Global."NormalizeInterval" ( EquipmentUsed.relevantDatetime, EquipmentUsed.relevantPeriod ) ends during day of "Measurement Period"
  )
  or exists ( ["Diagnosis": "Frailty Diagnosis"] FrailtyDiagnosis
  where FrailtyDiagnosis.prevalencePeriod overlaps "Measurement Period"
  )
  or exists ( ["Encounter, Performed": "Frailty Encounter"] FrailtyEncounter
  where FrailtyEncounter.relevantPeriod overlaps "Measurement Period"
  )
  or exists ( ["Symptom": "Frailty Symptom"] FrailtySymptom
  where FrailtySymptom.prevalencePeriod overlaps "Measurement Period"
  )

The question is, if a patient has a a Frailty Diagnosis with an active date of 2022 with no resolved date (and no other interactions or diagnoses of it since 2022), should that Frailty Diagnosis still count in 2024 reporting year/measurement period? Or does there have to be some sort of indication or interaction or instance of that Frailty Diagnosis in the reporting year/measurement period in order for it to count?