Uploaded image for project: 'eCQM Issue Tracker'
  1. eCQM Issue Tracker
  2. CQM-675

Certain EP measures do not give a clear indication as to what should be used to track the IPP for the Eligible Professional attesting. CMS 129, 132 and 133 particularly do not have an encounter in the IPP, but have procedures.

XMLWordPrintable

    • Icon: EC eCQMs - Eligible Clinicians EC eCQMs - Eligible Clinicians
    • Resolution: Answered
    • Icon: Major Major
    • Measure
    • Natalie Erickson
    • 952.918.7288
    • Meditech/LSS Data Systems
    • Hide
      CMS ID Measure Title
      CMS129v1 Prostate Cancer: Avoidance of Overuse of Bone Scan for Staging Low-Risk Prostate Cancer Patients
      CMS132v1 Cataracts: Complications within 30 Days Following Cataract Surgery Requiring Additional Surgical Procedures
      CMS133v1 Cataracts: 20/40 or Better Visual Acuity with 90 Days Following Cataract Surgery

      Measures 132 and 133 are episode based. Measure 129 is patient based. The commenter should refer to the definitions for these terms provided in the “Clinical Quality eMeasure Logic and Implementation Guidance v1.5” available at: http://www.cms.gov/Regulations-and-Guidance/Legislation/EHRIncentivePrograms/Downloads/2014_eCQM_LogicGuidance_June2013.pdf

      In order for a patient to qualify for measure inclusion, the patient must have had one of the defined procedures performed during the specified timeframe (or other requirements outlined in the eCQM specification). It is expected that the provider reporting on each of the three measures performs the quality action in the numerator. The numerator will not be evaluated unless the patient meets the denominator criteria (has a procedure performed within the given time frame).

      For CMS129, given that an EP cannot control another EP’s ordering of a bone scan and wouldn’t want to be penalized based on another EP’s decision, this measure allows for an exception with an example being “bone scan ordered by someone other than reporting physician”.

      For CMS132 and CMS133, the EP reporting on the measure could be the cataract surgeon or another eye care provider that is performing the follow up action described in the numerator.

      The PCPI agrees that the patient list is determined in the denominator. CMS133 specifically targets the physicians that are performing the numerator action and captures that the patient did or did not meet 20/40, regardless if they were the procedure performing physician. That said, we agree with your summarized approach, “…numerator would include patients from the denominator with 20/40 vision or better, regardless of which provider handled the follow-up appointment.”

      In response to the follow-up question regarding CMS 158, a provider should report if they are involved at any point during the mom’s pregnancy, prenatal care through and including the day of delivery. Of note, patients must meet the initial patient population definition to be included in this measure (i.e., age 12 and older who had a liver birth or delivery during the measurement period).
      Show
      CMS ID Measure Title CMS129v1 Prostate Cancer: Avoidance of Overuse of Bone Scan for Staging Low-Risk Prostate Cancer Patients CMS132v1 Cataracts: Complications within 30 Days Following Cataract Surgery Requiring Additional Surgical Procedures CMS133v1 Cataracts: 20/40 or Better Visual Acuity with 90 Days Following Cataract Surgery Measures 132 and 133 are episode based. Measure 129 is patient based. The commenter should refer to the definitions for these terms provided in the “Clinical Quality eMeasure Logic and Implementation Guidance v1.5” available at: http://www.cms.gov/Regulations-and-Guidance/Legislation/EHRIncentivePrograms/Downloads/2014_eCQM_LogicGuidance_June2013.pdf In order for a patient to qualify for measure inclusion, the patient must have had one of the defined procedures performed during the specified timeframe (or other requirements outlined in the eCQM specification). It is expected that the provider reporting on each of the three measures performs the quality action in the numerator. The numerator will not be evaluated unless the patient meets the denominator criteria (has a procedure performed within the given time frame). For CMS129, given that an EP cannot control another EP’s ordering of a bone scan and wouldn’t want to be penalized based on another EP’s decision, this measure allows for an exception with an example being “bone scan ordered by someone other than reporting physician”. For CMS132 and CMS133, the EP reporting on the measure could be the cataract surgeon or another eye care provider that is performing the follow up action described in the numerator. The PCPI agrees that the patient list is determined in the denominator. CMS133 specifically targets the physicians that are performing the numerator action and captures that the patient did or did not meet 20/40, regardless if they were the procedure performing physician. That said, we agree with your summarized approach, “…numerator would include patients from the denominator with 20/40 vision or better, regardless of which provider handled the follow-up appointment.” In response to the follow-up question regarding CMS 158, a provider should report if they are involved at any point during the mom’s pregnancy, prenatal care through and including the day of delivery. Of note, patients must meet the initial patient population definition to be included in this measure (i.e., age 12 and older who had a liver birth or delivery during the measurement period).
    • CMS129v1/NQF0389, CMS132v1/NQF0564, CMS133v1/NQF0565, CMS158v1/NQF0608

      Certain EP measures do not give a clear indication as to what is used to establish the IPP for a particular Eligible Professional attesting on the measure. CMS 129, 132 and 133 particularly do not have an encounter in the IPP, but have procedures. Is the assumption that in order to count in a particular EP's measure that the EP needs to be the performing provider on the procedure, for example, cataracts surgery? If this is the case, it doesn't seem likely that the EP would be performing these types of procedures. Or, would all patients within the provider's location that meet the criteria listed count towards an EP's measure? Please provide some guidance on how we should be establishing the EP relationship to a patient within these three measures.

            rtallapragada Ramya Tallapragada (Inactive)
            lssdata Natalie Erickson (Inactive)
            Minet Javellana (Inactive)
            Votes:
            0 Vote for this issue
            Watchers:
            4 Start watching this issue

              Created:
              Updated:
              Resolved:
              Comment Posted On: