-
EC eCQMs - Eligible Clinicians
-
Resolution: Answered
-
Moderate
-
None
-
None
-
-
CMS0002v12
-
Large impact on reporting incorrect outcomes related to using only the date of the start of a 30-day recurring encounter as the qualifying date, not the date of when the actual qualifying encounter is completed within that 30-day recurring encounter.
We have a Cancer TIN that we report on that uses 30-day recurring encounters (ex.12/1-12/31) with use of multiple qualifying encounter codes by different providers within this 30-day encounter. While validating the measure CMS02(Screening for Depression and Follow-Up Plan) we have come across a patient that had a depression screening on in the middle of the 30-day encounter, (ex. use of 30-day recurring encounter of dates 12/1/23-12/31/23 with qualifying encounter code of 99205 on 12/20/23 with proper depression screening completed on 12/20/23), our vendor is saying because the encounter started on 12/1/23 and screening was done on 12/20/23 that is after the start date and would not be used to determine the patient outcome on the report. We see it as there was not a qualifying encounter code (99205) used on the start of this 30-day recurring encounter of date of 12/1/23, the date was within this 30-day recurring encounter on 12/20/23 of a qualifying encounter performed with visit code and depression screening performed on the date of 12/20/23. Per our vendor they have to use the date of the start of the 30-day recurring encounter related to the specification logic, see below. Can you clarify if this is how the logic is intended to be used when there is a 30-day recurring encounter involved? Thank you.
Per Specification " (AdultScreening.relevantDatetime, AdultScreening.relevantPeriod ) 14 days or less on or before day of start of QualifyingEncounter.relevantPeriod