Uploaded image for project: 'eCQM Issue Tracker'
  1. eCQM Issue Tracker
  2. CQM-6657

CMS1028 PC-07 & CMS334 PC-02 Gestational age

XMLWordPrintable

    • Icon: EH/CAH eCQMs EH/CAH eCQMs
    • Resolution: Answered
    • Icon: Moderate Moderate
    • None
    • None
    • Cari Jones
    • 4054738842
    • INTEGRIS Healthcare
    • Hide
      Thank you for your question about rounding of gestational age for CMS1028, the Severe Obstetric Complications eCQM, PC-07 & CMS334, the Cesarean Birth eCQM, PC-02. As you stated the Guidance section for these measures indicates that an infant born on the 5th day of the 36th week (35 weeks and 5/7 days) is at a gestational age of 35 weeks, not 36 weeks. Applying this guidance to a calculated gestational age of 38 weeks and 6 days should be reported as 38 weeks, not 37 weeks. Your second question where gestational age is 38 weeks and 5 days should be reported as 38 weeks and not 37 weeks. Gestational age should be rounded down to the nearest completed week. I hope this clears up any confusion.
      Show
      Thank you for your question about rounding of gestational age for CMS1028, the Severe Obstetric Complications eCQM, PC-07 & CMS334, the Cesarean Birth eCQM, PC-02. As you stated the Guidance section for these measures indicates that an infant born on the 5th day of the 36th week (35 weeks and 5/7 days) is at a gestational age of 35 weeks, not 36 weeks. Applying this guidance to a calculated gestational age of 38 weeks and 6 days should be reported as 38 weeks, not 37 weeks. Your second question where gestational age is 38 weeks and 5 days should be reported as 38 weeks and not 37 weeks. Gestational age should be rounded down to the nearest completed week. I hope this clears up any confusion.
    • CMS0334v4
    • Gestational age correctly represented in QRDA file before submitted

      Guidance for both PC-07 and PC-02 re: GA states, "Note however the calculation may yield a non-whole number and gestational age should be rounded off to the nearest completed week. For example, an infant born on the 5th day of the 36th week (35 weeks and 5/7 days) is at a gestational age of 35 weeks, not 36 weeks.

      Using this guidance, can you confirm that a calculated gestational age of 38w6d would need to be shown in the QRDA file as 37wks? Or 38w5d would also need to show up in the file as a gestational age of 37 weeks?

            JLeflore Mathematica EH eCQM Team
            shorca Cari Ann Jones
            Votes:
            0 Vote for this issue
            Watchers:
            2 Start watching this issue

              Created:
              Updated:
              Resolved:
              Solution Posted On: