Uploaded image for project: 'eCQM Issue Tracker'
  1. eCQM Issue Tracker
  2. CQM-6286

VTE- ambulatory documentation

XMLWordPrintable

    • Icon: EH/CAH eCQMs EH/CAH eCQMs
    • Resolution: Answered
    • Icon: Moderate Moderate
    • None
    • None
    • Gilbert Matlock
    • 501-380-1013
    • Unity Health
    • Hide
      Hello and thank you for your question. For CMS108v12/VTE-1 and CMS190v12/VTE-2 measures, ambulation alone is not a sufficient reason for not administering VTE prophylaxis. Reasons for no pharmacological and/or no mechanical VTE prophylaxis must be explicitly documented by the MD/APN/PA or pharmacist and linked with VTE prophylaxis. In order for ambulation to be considered as an acceptable reason, there needs to be explicit documentation, e.g., “patient out of bed and ambulating in halls – no VTE prophylaxis needed.” We hope this helps.
      Show
      Hello and thank you for your question. For CMS108v12/VTE-1 and CMS190v12/VTE-2 measures, ambulation alone is not a sufficient reason for not administering VTE prophylaxis. Reasons for no pharmacological and/or no mechanical VTE prophylaxis must be explicitly documented by the MD/APN/PA or pharmacist and linked with VTE prophylaxis. In order for ambulation to be considered as an acceptable reason, there needs to be explicit documentation, e.g., “patient out of bed and ambulating in halls – no VTE prophylaxis needed.” We hope this helps.
    • CMS0104v12
    • CMS0117v12
    • CMS1028v1
    • CMS0117v11
    • If a RN or LPN documents that a patient is ambulatory is that acceptable or does it have to be a physician, APN or PA.

          JLeflore Mathematica EH eCQM Team
          gilbert.matlock Gilbert Matlock
          Votes:
          0 Vote for this issue
          Watchers:
          2 Start watching this issue

            Created:
            Updated:
            Resolved:
            Solution Posted On: