Uploaded image for project: 'eCQM Issue Tracker'
  1. eCQM Issue Tracker
  2. CQM-5965

CMS 506v4&5 Denominator Exclusion Logic Interpretation When Multiple Episodes of Care

XMLWordPrintable

    • Icon: EC eCQMs - Eligible Clinicians EC eCQMs - Eligible Clinicians
    • Resolution: Answered
    • Icon: Moderate Moderate
    • None
    • None
    • Ping Jiang
    • The Joint Commission
    • Hide
      Thank you for your question regarding CMS506v5 Safe Use of Opioids – Concurrent Prescribing. The intent of the measure is episode-based, and is meant to review each patient encounter separately from other encounters. If a patient has two encounters during the relevant period, and has a denominator exclusion, such as cancer, that only applies to one of the encounters, only one encounter should be excluded. We hope this helps.
      Show
      Thank you for your question regarding CMS506v5 Safe Use of Opioids – Concurrent Prescribing. The intent of the measure is episode-based, and is meant to review each patient encounter separately from other encounters. If a patient has two encounters during the relevant period, and has a denominator exclusion, such as cancer, that only applies to one of the encounters, only one encounter should be excluded. We hope this helps.
    • CMS0506v5
    • CMS0506v4
    • Causing wrong outcome when there are multiple episodes of care.

      As a data receiver, we’ve received several reports on outcome mismatches for Opioid CMS506v4 when there are multiple episodes of care. 

      We came across this ticket during research and understood the updated logics had been in CMS506v5. https://oncprojectracking.healthit.gov/support/browse/CQM-5846

      We have further question – 

      Looking at the exclusion logic below, assuming there are two episodes A and B, only B has Dx code in “Primary and Secondary Cancer” that is expected in the Exclusion.

      When evaluating the top statement ("Inpatient Encounters with an Opioid or Benzodiazepine at Discharge") on line 1, episode A and B will be pulled to be evaluated on the “exists” statements for exclusion.  

      Then the  “or exists” statement on line 3 is calling for "Inpatient Encounters with an Opioid or Benzodiazepine at Discharge" again, which both episode A and B will be checked for "All Primary and Secondary Cancer".  Since there is one episode (B) qualifies, the evaluation of “or exists” in line 5 would always be true regardless the episode A or B in line 1 being evaluated.  

      As the result, if one episode qualifies the "All Primary and Secondary Cancer" exclusion, all episodes from the multiple episodes of care patient will receive Exclusion as the outcome.   We’d like to get the clarification if this is what measure intended? 

      Denominator Exclusions
      line no.                        Logics
      1          "Inpatient Encounters with an Opioid or Benzodiazepine at Discharge" InpatientEncounter
                   where

      2          exists (["Diagnosis": "All Primary and Secondary Cancer"] Cancer
                              where Cancer.prevalencePeriod overlaps InpatientEncounter.relevantPeriod )

      3          or exists (“Inpatient Encounters with an Opioid or Benzodiazepine at Discharge" InpatientEncounter
                              where exists InpatientEncounter.diagnoses Diagnosis
                              where Diagnosis.code in "All Primary and Secondary Cancer")
      4          or exists ("Intervention Palliative or Hospice Care" PalliativeOrHospiceCare     

      where Coalesce(start of Global."NormalizeInterval"(PalliativeOrHospiceCare.relevantDatetime, PalliativeOrHospiceCare.relevantPeriod), PalliativeOrHospiceCare.authorDatetime)during Global."HospitalizationWithObservation" ( InpatientEncounter ) )

      5          or exists (“Inpatient Encounters with an Opioid or Benzodiazepine at Discharge" InpatientEncounter

                                     where InpatientEncounter.dischargeDisposition in "Discharge To Acute Care Facility"

                                     or InpatientEncounter.dischargeDisposition in "Hospice Care Referral or Admission"

                                     or InpatientEncounter.dischargeDisposition in "Patient Expired")

       

      Or, if the intention is to only include episode B in the exclusion, would the logic interpretation below, which is closer to CMS506v3, be better meeting the measure’s intention? 

      Denominator Exclusions
      line no.                        Logics
      1          "Inpatient Encounters with an Opioid or Benzodiazepine at Discharge" InpatientEncounter
                   where

      2          exists (["Diagnosis": "All Primary and Secondary Cancer"] Cancer
                              where Cancer.prevalencePeriod overlaps InpatientEncounter.relevantPeriod )

      3          or exists (“Inpatient Encounters with an Opioid or Benzodiazepine at Discharge" InpatientEncounter
                              where exists InpatientEncounter.diagnoses Diagnosis
                              where Diagnosis.code in "All Primary and Secondary Cancer")
      4          or exists ("Intervention Palliative or Hospice Care" PalliativeOrHospiceCare     

      where Coalesce(start of Global."NormalizeInterval"(PalliativeOrHospiceCare.relevantDatetime, PalliativeOrHospiceCare.relevantPeriod), PalliativeOrHospiceCare.authorDatetime)during Global."HospitalizationWithObservation" ( InpatientEncounter ) )

      5          or exists (“Inpatient Encounters with an Opioid or Benzodiazepine at Discharge" InpatientEncounter

                                     where InpatientEncounter.dischargeDisposition in "Discharge To Acute Care Facility"

                                     or InpatientEncounter.dischargeDisposition in "Hospice Care Referral or Admission"

                                     or InpatientEncounter.dischargeDisposition in "Patient Expired")

       

            JLeflore Joelencia Leflore
            TJC_eCQM The Joint Commission (Inactive)
            Votes:
            1 Vote for this issue
            Watchers:
            9 Start watching this issue

              Created:
              Updated:
              Resolved:
              Solution Posted On: