Uploaded image for project: 'eCQM Issue Tracker'
  1. eCQM Issue Tracker
  2. CQM-5501

left against medical advice

XMLWordPrintable

    • Icon: EH/CAH eCQMs - Eligible Hospitals/Critical Access Hospitals EH/CAH eCQMs - Eligible Hospitals/Critical Access Hospitals
    • Resolution: Answered
    • Icon: Moderate Moderate
    • None
    • None
    • Verlin Guanga
    • 646-460-0933
    • NY Presbyterian Brooklyn Methodist Hospital
    • Hide
      Thank you for your inquiry on CMS108, Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis. Leaving against medical advice (AMA) is not, in and of itself, a valid reason for exclusion. Patient refusal is acceptable, but it needs to be documented within the same timeframe that VTE prophylaxis should have been received.
      Show
      Thank you for your inquiry on CMS108, Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis. Leaving against medical advice (AMA) is not, in and of itself, a valid reason for exclusion. Patient refusal is acceptable, but it needs to be documented within the same timeframe that VTE prophylaxis should have been received.
    • CMS0108v11
    • VTE 1

      The patient is in the hospital from 7/11 to 7/13 and left against medical advice. Will this be considered as an implied refusal and should be excluded? Please advise. Thanks.

            JLeflore Joelencia Leflore
            vec9020 Verlin Guanga (Inactive)
            Votes:
            0 Vote for this issue
            Watchers:
            2 Start watching this issue

              Created:
              Updated:
              Resolved:
              Solution Posted On: