Uploaded image for project: 'eCQM Issue Tracker'
  1. eCQM Issue Tracker
  2. CQM-4751

New Palliative Care Exclusion across multiple measures (eCQMS)

XMLWordPrintable

    • Icon: EC eCQMs EC eCQMs
    • Resolution: Answered
    • Icon: Moderate Moderate
    • Guidance
    • Allison Marks
    • 6038581542
    • MEDITECH
    • Hide
      ​Thank you for your inquiry for the palliative care exclusion in CMS 124, CMS 125, CMS 131, CMS 122, CMS 156, CMS 130, CMS 134, and CMS 165. For the 2022 performance period, please use "Intervention, Performed", "Assessment, Performed", and "Encounter, Performed" as specified and required by the logic. NCQA is considering, for a future version, allowing for "Diagnosis". As for "Intervention, Order", this is not currently allowed for palliative care (which we consider as separate exclusion strategy from hospice) because the exclusion was developed with the intent to restrict to situations where we were fairly certain that the patient was receiving palliative care and to avoid situations where palliative care was ordered by the physician but the patient never followed through.
      Show
      ​Thank you for your inquiry for the palliative care exclusion in CMS 124, CMS 125, CMS 131, CMS 122, CMS 156, CMS 130, CMS 134, and CMS 165. For the 2022 performance period, please use "Intervention, Performed", "Assessment, Performed", and "Encounter, Performed" as specified and required by the logic. NCQA is considering, for a future version, allowing for "Diagnosis". As for "Intervention, Order", this is not currently allowed for palliative care (which we consider as separate exclusion strategy from hospice) because the exclusion was developed with the intent to restrict to situations where we were fairly certain that the patient was receiving palliative care and to avoid situations where palliative care was ordered by the physician but the patient never followed through.
    • CMS0122v10
    • Coding SQL reports and best practices for 2022 EP/EC eCQMs

      For 2022, many measures have the Denominator Exclusions updated to add an exclusion for palliative care. For example, CMS 124, CMS 125, CMS 131, CMS 122, CMS 156, CMS 130, CMS 165 all include this new denominator exclusion. 

      New Value Sets include:

      • Palliative Care Encounter (2.16.840.1.113883.3.464.1003.101.12.1090)
      • Palliative Care Intervention (2.16.840.1.113883.3.464.1003.198.12.1135)
      • Added direct reference code LOINC code (71007-9) Palliative Care Questionnaire (FACIT-Pal)

      New Logic Code:

      PalliativeCare.Palliative Care in the Measurement Period
      exists ( ["Assessment, Performed": "Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy - Palliative Care Questionnaire (FACIT-Pal)"] PalliativeAssessment
      where Global."NormalizeInterval"(PalliativeAssessment.relevantDatetime, PalliativeAssessment.relevantPeriod) overlaps "Measurement Period"
      )
      or exists ( ["Encounter, Performed": "Palliative Care Encounter"] PalliativeEncounter
      where PalliativeEncounter.relevantPeriod overlaps "Measurement Period"
      )
      or exists ( ["Intervention, Performed": "Palliative Care Intervention"] PalliativeIntervention
      where Global."NormalizeInterval"(PalliativeIntervention.relevantDatetime, PalliativeIntervention.relevantPeriod) overlaps "Measurement Period"
      )

       

      We are trying to determine what workflows we should be looking to. We noticed this tends to align with the frailty and Hospice exclusions in some cases so we are thinking we would include Orders (ie procedure and referral orders) for palliative care and also palliative care on the problem list. However, there is no "Intervention, ordered" (like there is for Has.Hospice) and there is no "Diagnoses" specific value set included (like there is for Frailty, Frailty Diagnoses). Therefore we are questioning whether we should include Interventions, assessments, and encounters only OR if this can include problems, Orders, interventions, assessments, and encounters. 

      Any insight you can provide will be helpful in moving us forward in the right direction for our reports. 

       

            edave Mathematica EC eCQM Team
            amarks Allison Marks (Inactive)
            Votes:
            9 Vote for this issue
            Watchers:
            10 Start watching this issue

              Created:
              Updated:
              Resolved:
              Solution Posted On: