-
Intent/Governance affecting more than 1 eCQM
-
Resolution: Answered
-
Major
In past clinical quality measure specifications, as well as stage 2 core/menu measures and many other clinical quality programs, there are not strict requirements to capture and report on an initial patient population, denominator exclusions and denominator exceptions - there are simply a denominator, a numerator, and exclusions.
We have built our quality management engine over the past few years around the concept of having just three values to report on for a measure/provider combination. Could you clarify if it is now a strict requirement that we report separate values for MU stage 2 CQM's (probably through the QRDA category III file) for the initial patient population, denominator, denominator exclusions, denominator exceptions, and numerator? If so, is this a requirement for certification as an EHR vendor? These new concepts are not referenced anywhere in the ONC or CMS final rules for stage 2.
Could you also clarify the clinical rationale for having this many distinct calculations? It seems as though the measure specifications sometimes arbitrarily put a patient with a particular set of criteria in one set or another.
Thank you for your help.