Uploaded image for project: 'eCQM Issue Tracker'
  1. eCQM Issue Tracker
  2. CQM-1786

Handling device order not done in QRDA I

XMLWordPrintable

    • Icon: Implementation Problem Implementation Problem
    • Resolution: Answered
    • Icon: Minor Minor
    • None
    • Satej Prabhu
    • Medhost Inc
    • Hide
      This issue was discussed extensively by the HL7 SDWG and CQI workgroup. A disposition was approved during the CQI workgroup meeting, please refer to the DSTU comment for detail.
      http://www.hl7.org/dstucomments/showdetail_comment.cfm?commentid=696

      The disposition is likely to be implemented in the next update to the HL7 QRDA-I, DSTU Release 3 standard. This disposition is to HL7 QRDA-I, DSTU R3 only, it does not apply to HL7 QRDA-I, R2 and has no impact to the reporting for the 2015 reporting year.

      For the 2015 reporting year, the HQR receiving system is aware of this issue and will provide a workaround fix.
      Show
      This issue was discussed extensively by the HL7 SDWG and CQI workgroup. A disposition was approved during the CQI workgroup meeting, please refer to the DSTU comment for detail. http://www.hl7.org/dstucomments/showdetail_comment.cfm?commentid=696 The disposition is likely to be implemented in the next update to the HL7 QRDA-I, DSTU Release 3 standard. This disposition is to HL7 QRDA-I, DSTU R3 only, it does not apply to HL7 QRDA-I, R2 and has no impact to the reporting for the 2015 reporting year. For the 2015 reporting year, the HQR receiving system is aware of this issue and will provide a workaround fix.
    • Hide
      VTE1 measure requires Device, Order not done. This is not defined in QRDA sepc(CDAR2 QRDA I R1 DSTU3 2015JUN). How does Cypress handles this concept?

      Do you accept below workaround as specified in QRDA-176 ticket?
      http://www.hl7.org/dstucomments/showdetail_comment.cfm?commentid=696

      Show
      VTE1 measure requires Device, Order not done. This is not defined in QRDA sepc(CDAR2 QRDA I R1 DSTU3 2015JUN). How does Cypress handles this concept? Do you accept below workaround as specified in QRDA-176 ticket? http://www.hl7.org/dstucomments/showdetail_comment.cfm?commentid=696

          dczulada David Czulada
          satejprabhu Satej Ramesh Prabhu (Inactive)
          Votes:
          0 Vote for this issue
          Watchers:
          3 Start watching this issue

            Created:
            Updated:
            Resolved:
            Solution Posted On:
            Comment Posted On: