Uploaded image for project: 'eCQM Issue Tracker'
  1. eCQM Issue Tracker
  2. CQM-1143

CMS163/NQF0064 Numerator Logic Missing

XMLWordPrintable

    • Icon: EC eCQMs - Eligible Clinicians EC eCQMs - Eligible Clinicians
    • Resolution: Answered
    • Icon: Minor Minor
    • Measure
    • None
    • Kristen Dodge
    • Hide
      Measure CMS122 and CMS163 have an important difference. CMS122 is capturing poor control over a patient’s HBA1c, so for that measure to be a numerator hit you are required to not have the service or have a high HBA1c. For CMS122 a lower score is better. CMS163 is capturing good control of LDL, so it is looking for an LDL level < 100. The Guidance for CMS163 lists what is not considered numerator compliant. Therefore, the statement you suggest would not be appropriate for the numerator of CMS163.
      Show
      Measure CMS122 and CMS163 have an important difference. CMS122 is capturing poor control over a patient’s HBA1c, so for that measure to be a numerator hit you are required to not have the service or have a high HBA1c. For CMS122 a lower score is better. CMS163 is capturing good control of LDL, so it is looking for an LDL level < 100. The Guidance for CMS163 lists what is not considered numerator compliant. Therefore, the statement you suggest would not be appropriate for the numerator of CMS163.
    • CMS163v1/NQF0064

      Shouldn't the Numerator also contain, "AND: OR NOT: Occurrence A of Laboratory Test, Result: LDL-C Laboratory Test during Measurement Period"?

      This was listed in the "Guidance" section of this measure spec. (And, is similar to CMS122/NQF0059 numerator.)

            rtallapragada Ramya Tallapragada (Inactive)
            kldodge Kristen Dodge (Inactive)
            Votes:
            0 Vote for this issue
            Watchers:
            3 Start watching this issue

              Created:
              Updated:
              Resolved:
              Solution Posted On:
              Comment Posted On: