Not getting 100% coverage in Bonnie - Union statements

XMLWordPrintable

    • Type: Bug
    • Resolution: Done
    • Priority: Blocker
    • Component/s: None
    • None
    • Critical blocker. This is an AU24 measure that requires 100% coverage in Bonnie.
    • Yes
    • QDM/CQL
    • CMS0832v1
    • Bug/Issue
    • MADiE

      CMS832 was revised by removing 'not null' logic from some definitions to resolve 99% coverage issue due to inability to test 'not null' in Bonnie. These definitions now show as covered, but Bonnie is now showing unexpected non-coverage area elsewhere:

      The only items not in green within Bonnie are two 'union' operators - See screen shot. We assume this is causing the 99% only coverage, but there are test cases that cover the two denominator exclusions that are attached to the 'union' operaters:

      We do not understand why these are not covered, please assist. Thank you.

        1. image-2023-12-08-13-36-59-601.png
          29 kB
          Michelle Lefebvre
        2. image-2023-12-08-13-39-08-321.png
          17 kB
          Michelle Lefebvre
        3. ScreenShot Areas not covered.docx
          394 kB
          Michelle Lefebvre

            Assignee:
            Jennifer Seeman
            Reporter:
            Michelle Lefebvre
            Votes:
            0 Vote for this issue
            Watchers:
            11 Start watching this issue

              Created:
              Updated:
              Resolved: