You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.
Compare with Current
View Page History
Version 1
Next »
Things to be done to get to V3
- FHIR Profiles for FAST Identity
- Practitioner and Organization
- Extensions to $match operation?
- Revisit SME feedback from workshops - Carmen S/Catherine S
- Don't need to credit source of feedback - SMEs are not representing their organizations, rather sharing their personal expertise
- Follow up on when FAST is considered "done", is this by V3 or more? - MJ/Carmen S
- Use Cases - SMEs want to see use cases, do we agree? Need follow up with Chief Architects - Diana
- TTs can document how their solutions work for specific use cases if it helps illustrate/understand the solutions better, with the call out that these solutions are meant to be applied broader than the specific use case
- Consent - SME feedback wants FAST to tackle
- Could be a topic that can be addressed across TTs
- Consent could cover multiple topics
- Sharing identity
- Sharing PHI
- What can we learn from how other industries have tackled it? E.g. PSD2
- Provider Identity - role of NPPES, reliability of data
- Identity team to recommend next steps(?) to Directory team
- Ask team for opinion on whether to recommend ONC/CMS come up with incentives/mandates to keep NPPES data current. Why are so many providers/payers/entities having to pay for this data and pay to maintain it? Licensing Boards, State Medical Assns, etc. should be sources of data for NPPES 2.0