[MADIE-1366] Encounter, Performed not bound to valueset is ignored by Bonnie Created: 02/22/23 Updated: 07/12/23 Resolved: 03/08/23 |
|
Status: | Closed |
Project: | MADiE Issue Tracker |
Component/s: | Test Case Builder |
Affects Version/s: | None |
Fix Version/s: | None |
Type: | Bug/Issue | Priority: | Major |
Reporter: | Michael Holck | Assignee: | Chandra Bartleman (Inactive) |
Resolution: | No Response From User | Votes: | 0 |
Labels: | None | ||
Remaining Estimate: | Not Specified | ||
Time Spent: | Not Specified | ||
Original Estimate: | Not Specified |
Attachments: |
![]() |
Tool: | BONNIE |
Tool Version: | Bonnie QDM |
MADiE Release Version: | Bonnie QDM 5.1.3 |
Description |
For an outpatient measure we discussed using the Encounter, Performed class attribute to find the right types of Encounters. So we wrote code as ["Encounter, Performed": class in "Outpatient Activity Codes"] Encounters However, when importing this measure into Bonnie when you go to create a test patient there is no option to add an Encounter, Performed. It seems Bonnie ignores the Encounter, Performed since it is not bound to a valueset on code |
Comments |
Comment by Heather Frideres [ 07/12/23 ] |
The issue identified in this ticket has been resolved in the Bonnie QDM 5.1.3 release 7/12/23. |
Comment by Heather Frideres [ 03/08/23 ] |
Hello Michael- As communicated last week, the team has identified the cause of the issue you reported in your other ticket 1365, which also impacted this same measure. As you have confirmed you are able to move forward with your work on this measure, we are closing this ticket at this time. Let us know if you have any questions. Thank you |
Comment by Heather Frideres [ 03/06/23 ] |
Hello- We need to confirm if the alternative solution you mentioned in your other ticket (1365) also addresses the issue reported in this issue. As the same measure was impacted in both tickets, we think it is likely that you are able to move forward with your work with that alternative solution implemented. Please respond. Thank you |
Comment by Heather Frideres [ 03/01/23 ] |
Thank you for confirming the issues remain. We are continuing to review the issues you have reported and will get back to you once we have an update. Thank you |
Comment by Michael Holck [ 02/28/23 ] |
Heather.Frideres both issues are still there. Issue 1365 I can test the measure I just can't get complete 100% code coverage without being able to set the facilityLocation. Issue 1366 I can't even test the measure without an Encounter being able to be added. Not sure if CMS will approve the measure without 100% code coverage and complete testing. |
Comment by Heather Frideres [ 02/28/23 ] |
Hello Michael, We wanted to check in and see if the changes you made to the measure after reporting Jira 1365 that resulted in the you creating this ticket were still an issue. Are either/both issues reported preventing you from moving forward? Please confirm. Thank you |
Comment by Paul Denning [ 02/23/23 ] |
Possibly related to https://oncprojectracking.healthit.gov/support/browse/QDM-265 and https://oncprojectracking.healthit.gov/support/browse/BONNIEMAT-904 "Bonnie determines the set of available Elements based on the DataCriteriaSection of the HQMF, which only includes those Data Elements with Value Sets or DRC’s." Looks like the HQMF dataCriteriaSection does not have the the Encounter, Performed, so Bonnie does not know to make it available. Your example ["Encounter, Performed": class in "Outpatient Activity Codes"] is using the .class attribute instead of the "primaryCodePath" (i.e., .code), so maybe MAT doesn't know what to put in the HQMF. My tickets above were a little different in that there was no "filter" at all. |
Comment by Chandra Bartleman (Inactive) [ 02/23/23 ] |
Michael, Thank you for including the measure package and providing additional information. Our team is looking into your issue and will follow-up as additional information becomes available. |
Comment by Michael Holck [ 02/23/23 ] |
This is actually the same measure as the previous issue just taking a different approach. We though going to encounters might avoid the issue with Diagnostic Study not being able to set facilityLocation but turns out this is another issue with Encounter not having a valueset. I attached the updated measure package with this approach but keep in mind both issues are the same measure but with different packages |
Comment by Chandra Bartleman (Inactive) [ 02/22/23 ] |
Michael, We received your inquiry. Can you provide the name of the measure and also attach your measure package to this ticket? |
Comment by MADiE Team [ 02/22/23 ] |
Thank you for submitting your question/issue. We will assign this to a team member and respond in one business day. If your question/issue is related to a particular measure, please upload the corresponding measure package. |