[CQM-2551] 2017 Annual Update EP Measure Package Posting for Vendor Feedback Created: 03/13/17 Updated: 05/30/17 Resolved: 03/31/17 |
|
Status: | Closed |
Project: | eCQM Issue Tracker |
Component/s: | None |
Type: | Annual Update | Priority: | Moderate |
Reporter: | Mathematica EC Updates | Assignee: | Mathematica EC eCQM Team |
Resolution: | Answered | Votes: | 0 |
Labels: | None |
Last Commented Date: |
Description |
The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services invites vendors and stakeholders to review and provide feedback on draft electronic clinical quality measure (eCQM) measure packages that include logic and header changes for eCQMs under consideration for CMS quality reporting and payment programs. This opportunity will allow CMS to learn from EHR vendors who have the technical capabilities to test the Health Quality Measure Format (HQMF) code by directly consuming machine readable XML files for eCQMs. Testing will help CMS to identify instances in which XML code produces errors so that issues can be resolved prior to posting the fully specified measures this spring. The measures in both HTML and XML formats will be available through March 28, 2017. The draft measure packages are now available on the [ONC CQM Issue Tracker |ONC CQM Issue Tracker] via the following tickets:
Please report questions and comments regarding the draft measure packages to the[ONC CQM Issue Tracker |ONC CQM Issue Tracker] tickets listed above. *2017 eCQM Annual Update *
The updated eCQMs will be posted in Spring 2017 and will reflect 4.3 of the Quality Data Model (QDM). Measures will not be eligible for 2018 reporting unless and until they are proposed and finalized through notice-and-comment rulemaking for each applicable program. *For More Information * To find out more about electronic clinical quality measures, visit the [eCQI Resource Center|eCQI Resource Center] or [eCQM Library|eCQM Library]. |
Comments |
Comment by Mathematica EC eCQM Team [ 05/30/17 ] |
This issue has been addressed in the 2017 Annual Update. |
Comment by Dacier Iglesias (Inactive) [ 03/30/17 ] |
Hello, |
Comment by Jeffrey A. Hart (Inactive) [ 03/28/17 ] |
Along with the comment above, Kaiser Permanente recommends aligning this BP eCQM measure with the NCQA HEDIS CBP measure, which would include patients Please align this measure with this NCQA HEDIS Measure for consistency and reduction of burden in reporting. Response: CMS has not adopted the revised HEDIS controlling high blood pressure measure for use in its programs and models and has no immediate plans to do so. NCQA’s HEDIS Controlling High Blood Pressure measure is based on recommendations from the “2014 Evidence-Based Guideline for the Management of High Blood Pressure in Adults: Report From the Panel Members Appointed to the Eighth Joint National Committee.” |
Comment by Andrea Ketelhut (Inactive) [ 03/28/17 ] |
We would like to request that the Hypertension QIM be limited to ages 18-59 with the current guidelines. To align better with clinical best practices that establish a threshold for the population between 60-85 with a BP <150/90, this population would be excluded from the measure. Response: CMS has not adopted the revised HEDIS controlling high blood pressure measure for use in its programs and models and has no immediate plans to do so. NCQA’s HEDIS Controlling High Blood Pressure measure is based on recommendations from the “2014 Evidence-Based Guideline for the Management of High Blood Pressure in Adults: Report From the Panel Members Appointed to the Eighth Joint National Committee.” |
Comment by Justin Schirle (Inactive) [ 03/24/17 ] |
Draft measure comments: Less of a functional comment, but CMS-147 uses several different QDM categories, including immunization allergy and substance allergy, to indicate a patient is allergic to an immunization. CMS-117 currently only uses the diagnosis category, and it may be better if these two were aligned. Response: We will update the IPV vaccine logic to make sure only 3 vaccines are included. The immunization allergy and substance allergy categories are too broad because they include rashes and other minimal reactions. The only reason the patient should not receive the full series of shot is due to an anaphylactic reaction. CMS 347 The guidance says that the each population is distinct. If the patient has the Hypercholesterolemia data element, they could be in both population 2 and population 3. Response: We thank you for your feedback and will incorporate your suggestions into the measure logic. CMS-645. Response: Thanks for your comment. The medication is tied to the Diagnosis of the Prostate CA which must be active during the measurement period. |