The use of the STATIC context seems to be inconsistent across documentation.
In the original base standard document, (CDAR2_QRDAIII_DSTU_R1_2012NOV.pdf pp.47 it is written as the following;
This code SHALL contain exactly one [1..1] @code="55186-1" Measure Section (CodeSystem: LOINC 2.16.840.1.113883.6.1 STATIC) (CONF:19230).
In the CMS QRDA EP & HQR 2015 Implementation Guide (pp.40) it is written as the following;
This code SHALL contain exactly one [1..1] @code="55186-1" Measure Section (CodeSystem: LOINC 2.16.840.1.113883.6.1) (CONF:19230).
Presumably the STATIC binding is being removed in favor of guidelines for “Coded Simple” (CS).
Yet, in the LANTANA Rules file, the following rule is stated as follows;
<sch:assert id="a-67-19230" test="cda:code[@code='55186-1' and @codeSystem='2.16.840.1.113883.6.1']">This code SHALL contain exactly one [1..1] @code="55186-1" Measure Section (CodeSystem: LOINC 2.16.840.1.113883.6.1 STATIC) (CONF:19230).</sch:assert>
Further, in the example XML data file provided by Lantana, that comes with the CMS QRDA EP & HQR 2015 Implementation Guide, it shows the STATIC keyword being used at the data level.
<!-- SHALL contain exactly one [1..1] code (CONF:12798) that SHALL contain exactly one [1..1] @code="55186-1" Measure Section (CodeSystem: LOINC 2.16.840.1.113883.6.1 STATIC) (CONF:19230). -->
<code code="55186-1" displayName="measure section" codeSystem="2.16.840.1.113883.6.1"/>
Use of the STATIC binding keyword is inconsistent. Please update either the rules file or the documentation to show the intended binding.
See also Attached Description (JIRA Ticket Description.docx) (A little easier to read.)