Hospital Harm – Acute Kidney Injury

This issue belongs to an archived project. You can view it, but you can't modify it. Learn more

XMLWordPrintable

    • Type: EC eCQMs - Eligible Clinicians
    • Resolution: Unresolved
    • Priority: Moderate
    • Component/s: None
    • None
    • Ronald Hirsch, MD
    • 847-471-7273
    • Hospital Harm - Acute Kidney Injury

      Your AKI measure numerator is ludicrous. If a patient presents with septic shock, receives perfect care and yet over the next 48 hours has progressive loss of renal function and develops AKI, that would be considered preventable/reportable? If they present with a SCr of 2 from hepatorenal syndrome and develop worsening AKI, that is preventable/reportable? There are a great number of patients whose renal function is deteriorating on arrival to the hospital yet their SCr is below 4. If their SCr reaches a point over 1.5 baseline, that is considered preventable/reportable? It should also be noted that a large number of patients have no baseline SCr available; are they excluded from this measure? This needs to go back to the drawing board and start over.
      Finally, "Observational status" is just plain old gibberish. Observation is not a status; it is a service provided to outpatients. Some do use the term "observation status" but certainly not "observational status."

            Assignee:
            William Mulhern (Inactive)
            Reporter:
            Ronald Hirsch (Inactive)
            Archiver:
            Arslan Iqbal

              Created:
              Updated:
              Archived: