-
Bug/Issue
-
Resolution: Referred to External Party for Resolution
-
Major
-
None
-
None
-
MADiE
-
QI-Core
-
Cataracts: 20/40 or Better Visual Acuity within 90 Days Following Cataract SurgeryFHIR
-
CMS133FHIR
-
QI-Core/CQL
-
All
-
-
MADiE 1.1.10
-
Yes
Our understanding of the coverage calculation is that it should cover all lines of logic (cover all value sets) to achieve 100% coverage - and should perform the same between QDM and FHIR.
For CMS133FHIR in MADiE - the coverage is at 100%, but as you can see below there are lines of logic that are not covered in the test cases, but is still calculating at 100%.
In Bonnie QDM, you can see that each line of logic and value set are covered to reach 100% coverage.
Is there something causing MADiE coverage calculation to be different? Is the coverage calculation performing correctly in MADiE?
cc: jfajen nalbritton gcwinters808
- relates to
-
MADIE-1479 Test Case Coverage Is not 100% as expected
- Closed
-
CQLIT-345 Can not reach 100% coverage
- Resolved
-
MADIE-1530 Cannot reach 100% coverage for CMS349
- Closed