Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

Announcements

  • Thank you for your participation!! As of February 22, 2013, the esMD AoR Level 1 Implementation Guide has been finalized and Consensus-approved. The document below reflect updates that were proposed and agreed upon during the formal Consensus Process. Please contact the Workgroup Lead or Support Lead if you have any remaining questions or concerns.

Author of Record Workgroup Artifacts

ArtifactsArtifact LinkWiki LinkDate
AoR Level 1 Use CaseAoR L1 Use CaseClick Here9/20/12
AoR Level 1 IGAoR L1 IGClick Here2/22/13
AoR White Papers1. AoR SWG 1 White Paper
2. AoR SWG 2 White Paper
3. AoR SWG 3 White Paper
Click Here11/6/12
12/12/12
1/9/13
AoR Level 2 Use CaseAoR L2 Use CaseClick Here1/22/14
AoR Level 2 IGAoR L2 IGClick Here3/26/14
HL7 Digital Signatures IGHL7 Product PageN/A10/2014

How to Get Involved

  • Keep me Informed
    • To be notified about significant events and announcements from the project, follow this site
  • How can I contribute?
  • Add my organization as an official member
Edit SidebarRightEdit esMD Page Tabs
Edit PageTabs

Announcements

  • Thank you for your participation!! As of February 22, 2013, the esMD AoR Level 1 Implementation Guide has been finalized and Consensus-approved. The document below reflect updates that were proposed and agreed upon during the formal Consensus Process. Please contact the Workgroup Lead or Support Lead if you have any remaining questions or concerns.

How to Get Involved

  • Keep me Informed
    • To be notified about significant events and announcements from the project, follow this site
  • How can I contribute?
  • Add my organization as an official member
Edit SidebarRightEdit esMD Page Tabs
Edit PageTabs

Author of Record Workgroup Artifacts

ArtifactsArtifact LinkWiki LinkDate
AoR Level 1 Use CaseAoR L1 Use CaseClick Here9/20/12
AoR Level 1 IGAoR L1 IGClick Here2/22/13
AoR White Papers1. AoR SWG 1 White Paper
2. AoR SWG 2 White Paper
3. AoR SWG 3 White Paper
Click Here11/6/12
12/12/12
1/9/13
AoR Level 2 Use CaseAoR L2 Use CaseClick Here1/22/14
AoR Level 2 IGAoR L2 IGClick Here3/26/14
HL7 Digital Signatures IGHL7 Product PageN/A10/2014
Edit Artifact Table



Works Approved Through Consensus

DateArtifact NameArtifact Links
2/22/2013esMD AoR level 1 Implementation GuideDocument link
S&I Framework Repository Link

Consensus Process

The goal is unanimous consent, which is obtained by carefully considering and addressing significant input from the Community of Interest. Where unanimity is not possible, a group SHOULD strive to make consensus decisions where there is significant support and few abstentions.
Any significant deliverable of the Initiative Charter will be approved through a formal Consensus process. Each Initiative Member will provide one of the following votes during the Consensus process:
  • Yes
    • A Yes vote does not necessarily mean that the deliverable is the ideal one from the perspective of the Initiative Member, but that it is better to move forward than to block the deliverable
  • Yes with comments
    • If a Consensus Process attracts significant comments (through Yes with comment votes), it is expected that the comments be addressed in a future revision of the deliverable.
  • Formal Objection- with comments indicating a path to address the objection in a way that meets the known concerns of other members of the Community of Interest. "Formal Objection" vote without such comments will be considered Abstain votes.
    • A Formal Objection means that the objector cannot proceed with the project unless the objections are met. It is acceptable and expected to use a Formal Objection in a first consensus round to communicate a point of view or process issue that has not been addressed in the drafting of the initial deliverable.
    • Should a Consensus Process attract even one "Formal Objection" vote with comments from an Initiative Member, the deliverable must be revised to address the "Formal Objection" vote (unless an exceptional process is declared).
  • Abstain (decline to vote)

Note: If you have comments on multiple sections please submit a new entry for each comment. Only one vote will be counted per committed organization and each comment from members of a single organization must contain the same type of vote.
  • E.g. - If one member of ACME Corp. votes "Yes (with comment)" another member from ACME Corp. cannot vote "Object (with comment)." In such cases votes will be considered an "Abstain" vote. Alternatively, if one member of ACME Corp. votes "Objection (with comment)" on one section of the document but has comments regarding another section of the document, they are welcome to provide additional comments but their vote for the new comment must still be "Objection (with comment)."

esMD AoR Level 1 Implementation Guide (FINAL):




For Charter-specific questions, contact Sweta Ladwa (esMD Project Manager) - sweta.ladwa@esacinc.com
If you have questions or technical difficulties, contact: Apurva Dharia (S&I Administrative Lead) - apurva.dharia@esacinc.com

 

HTML
<iframe src="https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/embeddedform?formkey=dFNESG43MUZIVHRZR2VtQmJIRFpkMXc6MA" width="760" height="760" frameborder="0" marginheight="0" marginwidth="0">Loading...</iframe>
HTML
<iframe width='900' height='500' frameborder='0' src='https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/pub?key=0ApW4Ox66ml2IdFNESG43MUZIVHRZR2VtQmJIRFpkMXc&amp;output=html&amp;widget=true'></iframe>