Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

Attendees

Attendee

Name

Affiliation

x

ASTP Public Health Analyst (COR)

x

HL7 US Realm Senior Advisor

x

Director, Standards Division

x

HL7 US Realm PM

x

ASTP - Senior Terminology Adviser

x

ASTP - Medical Informatics Officer

x

ASTP - Branch Chief, Terminology and Content Delivery

x

ASTP - Health IT Specialist


The team discussed the use of the sex parameter for clinical use, the necessity of adding a fixed code to an extension, and the challenges of testing and implementing the Uscdi standard. They also reviewed the design and functionality of the Usee data elements in Cda, the creation and management of value sets, and the use of standardized vocabularies in other orders.

The team agreed to proceed with the current SPCU design , continue refining the value sets, and work with Eric to determine the best place to put SPCU additional guidance.

  • Gay to

...

  • present the USCDI US Core design next week.
  • Al and

...

  • Carmela to review the clinical tests value set and provide feedback on codes that should be excluded.
  • Gay to make changes to the clinical tests value set based on feedback, preferably before going into ballot.
  • ASTP team to consider adding clarification in the CCG if needed regarding testing for SPCU in FHIR

...

  • .
  • Gay to proceed with the original plan (bullet 2) for handling SPCU in FHIR without adding the LOINC code to the extension.


Sex Parameter for Clinical Use in FHIR US Core Discussion

...

The team agreed to consider the least impactful solution:  Reuse the Gender Harmony developed pre-existing design and provide guidance that existing extension carries the same meaning as 99501-9 Sex parameter for clinical use inherent in the elements of the extension itself.

...