[QDM-188] Use of SNOMED for allergy class Created: 01/03/18 Updated: 12/22/20 Resolved: 12/21/18 |
|
Status: | Resolved |
Project: | QDM Issue Tracker |
Component/s: | Data Model |
Type: | Guidance | Priority: | Moderate |
Reporter: | Floyd Eisenberg (Inactive) | Assignee: | Floyd Eisenberg (Inactive) |
Resolution: | Answered | Votes: | 0 |
Labels: | Guidance |
Attachments: |
![]() |
Description |
The current recommendation for Allergy/Intolerance is to restrict terminology to RxNorm ingredient terms. The 2018 ONC Interoperability Standards Advisory (https://www.healthit.gov/isa/) recommends "When a medication allergy necessitates capture by medication class, SNOMED CT® should be used." Should QDM allow the use of SNOMED CT, most likely the product hierarchy for medication classes? Evaluation at the last QDM User Group (December 18) suggested that the product hierarchy would be appropriate. The SNOMED disorder category can be used to address items on a problem list as diagnoses (using the QDM datatype Diagnosis). But use of Diagnosis would not cause allergy checking so the Allergy/Intolerance QDM datatype should most likely use the SNOMED product category, if SNOMED is allowed. |
Comments |
Comment by Floyd Eisenberg (Inactive) [ 12/21/18 ] |
The eCQM Governance Group reviewed the issue in November 2018 and agreed with a transition to use SNOMED-CT Substance Class for allergy class in eCQMs. To support the transition, the QDM User Group (December 19, 2018) noted: Claudia Hall (Mathematica) - Noted for the upcoming Annual Update, two measures will pilot this approach. Lisa Anderson (TJC) - Noted there is a one-year transition period. For the next annual update cycle, they are adding a value set that represents medication as a class in addition to the current value set. Will do this for one year and then solicit feedback from implementers to determine if the next cycle is a good time to remove the previous value set. This allows those on RxNorm to continue using it next year. No further action is required from the QDM User Group. |
Comment by Floyd Eisenberg (Inactive) [ 10/30/18 ] |
The QDM User Group met on October 17, 2018. Following is a summary of the discussion: To indicate an allergy instead of listing large value set, there is a desire to say allergic to a class of drug. [Reference the presentation provided by Rob McClure within this Jira Ticket.] Drug class is a grouper, i.e., a way to combine together medications that have some commonality, such a grouper is not a real thing. Drug classes have two primary uses, to provide:
These two uses do not reliably result in the same member list. True cross reactivity is a fairly illusive goal. Drug classes need to be captured in patient records. For example, the patient reports that, “I’m allergic to penicillin.” This information can be captured as text or as encoded data. We encode to link the class object to actual orderables. Mapping to an orderable list is a good deal of work. Orderable list inconsistency can cause harm. Drug class code system requirements:
Code System Options:
Suggested approach
Next Steps This proposal requires review and approval by the eCQM Governance Group before implementation. Review by the Governance Group should occur in the next several weeks. |
Comment by Floyd Eisenberg (Inactive) [ 10/17/18 ] |
QDM User Group medication class presentation uploaded to this Jira ticket - discussion on 17 October 2018.
|
Comment by Floyd Eisenberg (Inactive) [ 09/24/18 ] |
Due to availability of experts and preference to review options at the upcoming HL7 Plenary and Working Group Meeting in Baltimore (Oct 1-5, 2018), the topic is deferred to the October 17, 2018 QDM User Group. |
Comment by Floyd Eisenberg (Inactive) [ 09/14/18 ] |
Rescheduled for September 26, 2018 UG meeting |
Comment by Floyd Eisenberg (Inactive) [ 06/12/18 ] |
Lisa, Thank you for checking in. I had hoped to bring this up on the June 2018 QDM User Group meeting but Rob McClure will not be available. We will discuss on the July User Group meeting. |
Comment by Lisa Anderson (Inactive) [ 06/11/18 ] |
Hi Floyd- I am just following up on this to see if there has been a final resolution from the eCQM Governance group, since it has been a few months. |
Comment by Floyd Eisenberg (Inactive) [ 01/23/18 ] |
This issue was discussed on the Governance Committee today (January 23, 2018). MED-RT should be available by the end of 1st quarter, 2018. Therefore, MED-RT may be the preferred code system for drug class. ONC noted that the 2018 ISA indicated the use of SNOMED CT for drug class because the timing for MED-RT was not know, but that the ISA recommendation will be updated once MED-RT is available. The Governance Committee also will seek feedback on the issue regarding which body has the authority to make a decision on changes in terminology recommendations. For the present, any changes would not impact measures to be published in 2018 and implemented in 2019. Any changes will impact measures prepared for publication in 2019 and implementation in 2020. Will await a decision of the Governance Committee and inform the QDM User Group. |
Comment by Floyd Eisenberg (Inactive) [ 01/23/18 ] |
The QDM User Group discussed this issue on the January 17, 2018 call. |
Comment by Floyd Eisenberg (Inactive) [ 01/03/18 ] |
Adding SNOMED product class assumes that: |
Comment by Floyd Eisenberg (Inactive) [ 01/03/18 ] |
Schedule UG discussion regarding use of SNOMED-CT product hierarchy codes included with RxNorm ingredient codes. |