[MADIE-472] CMS149v6 Time frame Interpretation Created: 06/21/18 Updated: 08/23/18 Resolved: 07/05/18 |
|
Status: | Closed |
Project: | MADiE Issue Tracker |
Component/s: | None |
Affects Version/s: | None |
Fix Version/s: | None |
Type: | Bug/Issue | Priority: | Major |
Reporter: | Priyanka Murthy | Assignee: | Unassigned |
Resolution: | Answered | Votes: | 0 |
Labels: | None | ||
Remaining Estimate: | Not Specified | ||
Time Spent: | Not Specified | ||
Original Estimate: | Not Specified |
Attachments: |
![]() ![]() ![]() |
CBE Number: | CMS149v6 |
Description |
CMS149v6
As per the measure specifications for numerator Condition, the Assessment/ Intervention has to be performed during <=12 months starts before end of Occurrence A of $DEMEncounter149. Numerator =
As per the Bonnie tool, ‘<=12months starts before’ is interpreted as 12months+ 29days. Scenario1: Intervention performed during 12months+29thday Occurrence A of $DEMEncounter149 on 1/1/2012 Intervention performed during <=12months on 12/02/2010 – is satisfying the Numerator criteria. Scenario2: Intervention performed during 12months+30thday Occurrence A of $DEMEncounter149 on 1/1/2012 Intervention performed during <=12months on 12/01/2010 – is NOT satisfying the Numerator criteria.
Given the above scenarios, what exactly should be our time frame for this numerator condition. For <=12months, should we consider exactly 12months only OR (12months+29days)?
|
Comments |
Comment by James Bradley (Inactive) [ 08/23/18 ] |
Hi Priyanka, Yes that is what Lizzie meant in her answer. I hope that helps. Thank you, James |
Comment by Priyanka Murthy [ 08/22/18 ] |
lizziedy quoting the Solution: "If you look at 1/1/2012 and subtract 13 months, you get 12/1/2012. So 12/1/2012 is not <= 12 months before 1/1/2012 (it is 13 months before). However, 12/2/2012 is within the 12th month, just at the very end of it, so it is considered <= 12 months before 1/1/2012. " Do you mean: " If you look at 1/1/2012 and subtract 13 months, you get 12/1/2010. So 12/1/2010 is not <= 12 months before 1/1/2012 (it is 13 months before). However, 12/2/2010 is within the 12th month, just at the very end of it, so it is considered <= 12 months before 1/1/2012. " |
Comment by Lizzie Charbonneau [ 06/22/18 ] |
Hi Priyanka, The Bonnie definition isn't strictly "x months + 29 days". That happened to be the case in the last ticket because the months in question were 30 days long. The way Bonnie does month calculations is to add or subtract the relevant number of months. In this scenario, the two examples are: "12/2/2010 <= 12 months before 1/1/2012" -> true and "12/1/2012 <= 12 months before 1/1/2012" -> false If you look at 1/1/2012 and subtract 13 months, you get 12/1/2012. So 12/1/2012 is not <= 12 months before 1/1/2012 (it is 13 months before). However, 12/2/2012 is within the 12th month, just at the very end of it, so it is considered <= 12 months before 1/1/2012. For a more detailed explanation of timing calculations within QDM 4.3, please see the documentation here: https://ecqi.healthit.gov/system/files/qdm_4_3_508_compliant.pdf. The explanation starting on page 63 will be helpful. Let us know you if you have further questions. Thank you, |
Comment by MADiE Team [ 06/21/18 ] |
Thank you for submitting your question/issue. We will assign this to a team member and respond in one business day. If your question/issue is related to a particular measure, please upload the corresponding measure package. |